Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dinner
    commented on 's reply
    You think a dam in Ukraine belongs to Russia, eh? Also, yes, without a doubt Russia mined the dam half a year back, Russia had sole access to the control room, and Ukraine didn't have access as Russia blew up the road from the Ukrainian side half a year ago.

  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post

    The irony being Biden literally did the same thing as V.P..
    Biden's kid was getting millions from a company Joe protected from a prosecutor. Trump wanted that investigated.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    Immediately pivoting to allegations about Biden when Ming is posting about Trump's impeachment = a perfect example of whataboutism, Dinner.

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    The Nazis were in control of security. Why would Putin cause a massacre to topple the guy? Oh yea, cuz they blew up their own pipeline and dam.

  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Ming View Post


    More Maga nonsense. He was impeached for using his office for personal gains.
    You can argue all you want about Biden doing this or that, but it doesn't change the fact that Trump abused his power for personal gains.
    He was not impeached for the weapons. Nice try, but total BS.

    During the proceedings accusers said he delayed weapons to Ukraine thus endangering national security. In reality he was impeached over hypocritical BS the Dems had already done, from soliciting foreign election interference to using money and weapons for Ukraine to investigate political opponents. The difference is the Dems were lying about Trump and the Biden clan did get millions from Burisma and Joe fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter's company. That should have been investigated regardless of who was president.

    Before and after the election Democrats repeatedly asked Ukraine to investigate Trump, Ukraine even interfered in our election. Why is it okay to spend years investigating Trump over the lies the Democrats told to frame him as a traitor but he gets impeached for asking Zelensky to investigate influence peddling and election interference? The Biden family gets millions from Ukraine and Trump's the one accused of personal gain for wanting that investigated? Up is down.

    Trump's argument was he didn't trust Zelensky and wanted him to take the matter seriously to earn that trust. Investigating the conspiracy to help Hillary win was a factor in his relationship with Zelensky. I dont know how much personal gain he got, Biden only became the frontrunner after the SC primary. He got impeached for delaying weapons, course Biden threatened to withhold a billion to fire the prosecutor harassing his son's company. But the security state hates Trump so we cant expect consistency from them. Didn't Obama repeal some regulation restricting the security state apparatus from propagandizing Americans? Jimmy Dore has mentioned that a few times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    commented on 's reply
    There is no whataboutism. Biden literally sold the powers of his office as V.P. in exchange for millions in bribes. That is literally what you accused Trump of doing except Trump didn't take millions in bribes where as Biden did.

  • BlackCat
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

    What Russian sources have I used? I've seen the BBC interview a sniper, forensic evidence of the crime scene, and live police radio traffic all showing gunmen fired on cops and protesters. The cops retreated so the snipers kept shooting protesters. Odesa soon followed as the right wing cracked down on dissent. Western media starts noticing a 'problem' while Azov attacks eastern Ukrainian protesters. I've seen a few of the interviews with Right Sector et al bragging about how they were the muscle behind the revolution. I gotta believe Obama knew what was coming if he didn't outright order it, but whatever, he did embrace the coup and help it succeed. And then he and Joe armed these fine people to kill protesters along the border with Russia.

    So what specifically do you want documented? Nazis killing or attacking Ukrainians? Open your eyes, they've been doing it for years with our tax dollars. The people in the Donbas must roll their eyes when US presidents lecture the world about the war on terror.
    You keep up talking about this "BBC interview" but there are no evidence of nazi involvement in that - more likely russian involvement. As I said, prove it without using russian sources.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    his source is in the flood zone

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    Hasn't western media spent months hyping a spring offensive? The reason this war wasn't prevented much less stopped is because of foreign pressure.

  • Donegeal
    commented on 's reply
    The real irony here is that as VP, Biden didn't have the power to halt payments to foreign powers until his personal bidding was done.

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    Alexander Vindman reported Trump's call because he used weapons to get his investigation. If Trump never tied the weapons to his request he wouldn't have been impeached. Ofc the Dems are hypocrites about what he did, they were telling Ukraine to investigate Trump and Biden used a billion $ bribe to fire the prosecutor harassing Burisma. Ukraine did interfere in our election and Trump wanted that investigated.

  • Donegeal
    replied


    There is no retreat for Russian conscripts who don't even want to be there.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    If we set aside the whole "whataboutism" thing, the Ukrainian prosecutor was accused of corruption at the time. It was only a few months ago that more Ukrainian officials were dismissed on corruption grounds. Making sure that the money being sent is mostly spent on what it was supposed to be spent on (like say name brand military spec tires) is in the national interest. So no. Not the same.

  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Ming View Post


    More Maga nonsense. He was impeached for using his office for personal gains.
    You can argue all you want about Biden doing this or that, but it doesn't change the fact that Trump abused his power for personal gains.
    He was not impeached for the weapons. Nice try, but total BS.

    The irony being Biden literally did the same thing as V.P..

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    Saying Trump's impeachment was over foreign policy is pure effing BS, Berz.
Working...
X