Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geronimo
    commented on 's reply
    Alas, ukraine does not have a budget as large as the US. The $5 million missile expense translates into a political liability for donors.

  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    Except for the fact that the economy and military budget of the US >> Russia's.

  • BlackCat
    replied
    I could be wrong, but I think that there might be some cost involved in not shooting down those thingies.

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    That was a good read and a good take on where wiki gets its info from. So it is likely then that a kinzhal taking out a Patriot missile is a cost effective strategy for Russia afterall. ​​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by PLATO View Post
    Nope...I am wrong. Wiki says Kinzhals cost about $10 million each. The math seems to work on these.
    I'm skeptical.



    ​​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Nope...I am wrong. Wiki says Kinzhals cost about $10 million each. The math seems to work on these.

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Originally posted by Thoth View Post
    Russian hypersonic missiles appear to be excellent at destroying Patriot missiles in flight.
    Wonder what the cost of a Kinzhal is? Patriot missiles reportedly cost about $5 million each. Maybe Putin can claim a "financial" victory?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    commented on 's reply
    "Swiss navy", "The Expendables" ????

  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    Software is easily patched

  • Thoth
    replied
    Russian hypersonic missiles appear to be excellent at destroying Patriot missiles in flight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Only an idiot or an American (which is pretty much the same) could really believe that SAM system with a radar designed to track targets at Mach 3 and equipped with missiles, which travels at 2.8 Mach at best has ANY CHANCE to track and intercept a target, which travels at MACH 10!!!

    Keep eating your Kiev's sh!t, idiots!
    In addition to Plato's fine reply I'd like to address your assertion that the Mach 2.8 speed of the patriot makes its interception of an object at Mach 10 impossible.

    If I wanted to intercept a 600 kph bullet train with a stationary (0 kph) interceptor I could lay the interceptor on the track and be amazingly successful.

    the difficulty in an interception has nothing to do with the speed of the interceptor relative to the target and everything to do with accurately placing the interceptor in the path of the target within the available time window.

    The patriot system can track the kinzhal and guide the interceptor with more than enough accuracy to intercept. The only question would be can the kinzhal manoever enough to thwart the interception? Furthermore at hypersonic speeds will the kinzhal be more or less maneuverable and responsive than the much slower patriot interceptor? Russia has wanted the entire world to believe that it is. I'm not sure anybody is buying it anymore. Maybe it has something to do with the finding in the wreckage that Plato alluded to of those dishwasher parts that were found to have been MacGyvered into the missiles?

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    You love all kind of bullsh!t from your Kiev Bob's whore, but the fact is:




    Serb...did you even watch to 2:35?

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Only an idiot or an American (which is pretty much the same) could really believe that SAM system with a radar designed to track targets at Mach 3 and equipped with missiles, which travels at 2.8 Mach at best has ANY CHANCE to track and intercept a target, which travels at MACH 10!!!

    Keep eating your Kiev's sh!t, idiots!
    Kinzhals are crap. Analysis of their parts show that some are being constructed using washing machine parts.

    But...just to show your ignorance a bit more. The radar for a Patriot can track objects going MUCH faster than mach 10. It is the software that has limitations in processing that data. The evidence before us seems to show that your information is, at the very least, dated.

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post
    A hopless Western imbeciles with no clue about physics.
    I suppose you may be right. After all, I only took 5 different physics classes in college (just because I had an interest in the subject). What did you say your physics background was?

    Leave a comment:


  • Serb
    replied
    A hopless Western imbeciles with no clue about physics.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X