An actual political thread

[Ming]

Why... you never asked that of Trump, but now Biden has to?
Trump continues to lie every day and not a peep out of you. But to be expected sheep...

[Kidlicious]

wHy CaN't BiDeN LiE?!

[Kidlicious]

...

[Ming]

Typical Kid posts... just nonsense or empty words...

[Kidlicious]

Kidicious: The Democrats are saying that taxing corporations 3.5T dollars will have zero negative effect on the economy.

Ming: Donald Drumpf said he won the election.

[Ming]

Kid... we need Biden to own up to his lies
Kid... My fearless leader and master, Trump, can lie all he wants, and I will believe every word he says.

[Kidlicious]

I never do that. You do it constantly.

[Kidlicious]

Baker met with Sussmann alone. Why did he meet with Sussmann instead of sending agents that regularly do interviews? Why did he meet alone when the FBI always sends two agents to conduct interviews?

The article ended at the point where Sussmann was about to meet with James Baker, the general counsel of the FBI.

At the meeting, Sussmann allegedly delivered to Baker deceptive “white papers,” documents and computer data that were calculated to trigger an FBI investigation of the purported Trump-Alfa Bank connection. According to the indictment, once the FBI began its investigation, Sussmann, the top echelon of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign (“Clinton Campaign”) and others publicized the fact that the FBI was investigating possible ties between Trump and Russia.

Moreover, the indictment also avers that, even before his September 19, 2016, meeting with Baker, Sussmann disseminated the fabricated Trump-Alfa Bank narrative to the media. Quoting billing records and emails from Sussmann’s law firm (“Perkins Coie” which represented the Clinton Campaign), the indictment gives the following examples of how the smear was spread:

• On “about August 30, 2016, Reporter-1, who worked for “a major U.S. newspaper (‘Newspaper-1’),” emailed Sussmann: “I’m back in town. I see Russians are hacking away. [A]ny big news?” To this Sussmann replied: “Mind reader!… Can you meet Thurs and Fri?”
• On Thursday, September 1, 2016, Sussmann met with Reporter-1. He “billed his time for the meeting to the Clinton Campaign under the broader billing description ‘confidential meetings regarding confidential project.’”
• On September 12, 2016, Sussmann spoke with “Campaign Lawyer-1” (identified elsewhere as Sussmann’s law partner, Marc Elias, who represented the Clinton Campaign) by telephone regarding the Trump-Alfa Bank narrative. Sussmann and Elias each billed the call to the Clinton Campaign with Elias using the billing description “teleconference with M. Sussmann re: [Newspaper-1]” and Sussmann using the description “work regarding confidential project.”
• On September 15, 2016, Elias “exchanged emails with the Clinton Campaign’s campaign manager, communications director, and foreign policy advisor concerning the [Trump-Alfa Bank allegations] that Sussmann had recently shared with Reporter-1.” Elias “billed his time for this correspondence to the Clinton Campaign with the billing entry, ‘email correspondence with [name of foreign policy advisor], [name of campaign manager], [name of communications director] re: the [Alfa Bank] Article.’”

Now hit the pause button and consider this. These examples — as with so many other averments in the indictment — quote Perkins Coie’s billing records as well as emails between Sussmann, Elias, and others. They are direct, real-time, and devastating proof of overt acts and statements made in the course and in furtherance of the illegal but thus-far uncharged conspiracy outlined in the indictment. The fact that Durham has obtained this type of closely-guarded evidence speaks to his skill, tenacity, and seriousness of purpose, and spells serious legal trouble for all those who participated in concocting and spreading the Trump-Alfa Bank smear.

So, what happened when Sussmann met with Baker? The indictment avers some very unusual circumstances.

First, according to the indictment, when Baker and Sussmann met, “[n]o one else attended the meeting.” (Emphasis added)

How did that happen? When interviewing even the lowliest witness, the FBI always works in pairs. One agent does the questioning while the other takes notes.

But here, when a lawyer from a “major international law firm” representing the Clinton Campaign met with the FBI’s top lawyer during the Presidential campaign, no one else was present to document what transpired. Why?

Did Baker know in advance why Sussmann wanted to meet? If so, why wouldn’t Baker require the presence of a witness to document what was to transpire?

Second, why did Baker even agree to the meeting? Doesn’t the FBI have plenty of trained, perfectly competent special agents who gather facts and document their findings? Why wasn’t Sussmann’s contact handled by way of the FBI’s regular interview process?

The indictment explains that Sussmann’s meeting with Baker wasn’t his first interaction with the FBI. It states that “[i]n or about April 2016, the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) retained Sussmann to represent it in connection with the hacking of its email servers by the Russian government. In connection with his representation of the DNC as the victim of the hack, the defendant met and communicated regularly with the FBI, the DOJ, and other U.S. government agencies. In or around the same time period, Sussmann was also advising the Clinton Campaign in connection with cybersecurity issues.”

https://spectator.org/john-durham-dissects-a-smear-campaign/

[Ming]

I never do that. You do it constantly.

You have never admitted that Trump has lied about anything... and blindly post stuff you find on alt right sites.


You keep claiming that I believe whatever lie you think Biden has told, yet I haven't. I have claimed in the past that ALL politicians lie...
You only claim that dems lie.
You keep making up bs about how I get my news from CNN....
Yet you have posted more links to CNN than I ever have. I haven't watched or read a CNN story in a long time, not that I remember.

So keep sprouting all your BS and Lies... we expect it from Trump Sheep.

[Kidlicious]

You're just a heckler.

[Ming]

Better than a sheep....

[Kidlicious]

Not really, but you're a sheep too.

[Kidlicious]

Build Back Better sheep heckled Senator Sinema in the bathroom. That's not working.

[Kidlicious]

Absolute lunatics.

[Kidlicious]

That's what she gets for being a Democrat. They should do that to RINOs too.