Tweet
You support the authoritarian Deep State government and the political harassment of the citizens.
-
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
I'm not a big fan of people who shame minorities for not voting D. I will not read what you suggest.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
You don't call people White Supremacist! You don't name and shame people! -
So you are against free speech, and in favor of dark money. Nice. Julian Castro did not call anyone a white supremacist. And all individual donations of $200 or more to political campaigns are a matter of public record. BY LAW. Castro only called out the max donors, and my guess is that they are pretty proud to support their Dear Leader and don't feel shamed -- considering their large donations. -
I'm in favor of dark money now. The people who gave us the 1st Amendment protested anonymously to hide their identities from the King, free speech erodes when the King knows who is criticizing him. That poses a problem for me, transparency is required for boycotts. I want to know if my representative gets megabucks from corporations. Quite a dilemma.
-
-
Our Kidiot has never let things like facts stop a good rant. Silly you.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Maybe people don't want to patronize businesses run by people who give money to a narcissistic pu$$y grabberComment
-
Please keep up. The current accusation is that he has a plan to exterminate latinos.Originally posted by giblets View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Look man, there are your people out there that never heard that correction and believe that ****. Do you have any ****ing shame for defending scum like that! -
Your outrage is hilarious and/or hypocritical, esp. considering how your Daddy Trump flip-flops from supporting white nationalists to denouncing them, then turns right around and supports them again. But his WN friends see only the support. And they certainly have no ****ing shame for defending THAT scum.
But that's not what happened here. I searched you panicky sentence, did my own research, and learned the facts. Then I shared them in a post. I know that sounds like a lot of effort to you, but it only took me about 30 seconds.
-
Castro outed one of his own donors, proven by records.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Ok so I read it JR. Happy? This comes right after the shooting. He is blaming Hispanics in San Antonio for the murder of those people buy talking about Trump calling illegal immigrants people that are "invading" the country. The shooter used the word "invade." So he was shaming those Hispanics for supporting the murder of Hispanics. And you wanted me to read the tweet!I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Another journo on MSNBC suggested that Trump planned this whole thing so that the Flag will be raised to full staff on 8-8, which is a number significant to white nationalists.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
I just knew you hadn't read it. But even now that you *claim* you have, you make me doubt your word by totally mischaracterizing its content. Castro is blaming TRUMP DONORS for funding Trump's ongoing campaign to label immigrants as "invaders." He makes ZERO reference to the shooting. But that's not what your media masters told you to believe, so you just keep repeating their garbage interpretation.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Fun fact that makes me think you just lied about reading the original Castro tweet: There are very few Latin-sounding names - most would say NONE - on the list of 44 Maximum Trump Donor San Antonians:
Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-ArmsComment
-
Did you read the list of participants submitted to the police for the permit? I did, the majority of protesters were not neo-Nazis. They were various groups with their own causes protesting what they perceive to be a politically correct effort to remove history from the public square. If they shared the neo-Nazi's ideology they would have attended their night time tiki torch march. It doesn't matter who organized the 'unite the right' protest, he doesn't speak for all the other people who showed up to defend a statue.Originally posted by Aeson View Post
In the very same press conference Trump clearly condemned the neo-Nazis and white supremacists, but the media conveniently ignores what he said about them because it conflicts with their lie that he called neo-Nazis fine people. So guess what clip the media runs with - they show the night time tiki torch march alongside Trump's 'fine people on both sides' comment about the day time protest turned brawl. Who was the other side during the tiki torch march? Antifa didn't show up to protest them, there was no other side. The guilt by association you're employing for your double standard was used against people during the red scare of the McCarthy era.
Last edited by Berzerker; August 7, 2019, 19:59.Comment
-
Man, this is just some sick crap. I guess I deserve it because I knew that people like JR and giblets would be flippant about this. But I'm done.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Apparently "flippant" is the new "factual"...
Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-ArmsComment
-
The night time tiki torch rally was earlier in the year in May, and was in large part responsible for bringing the issue to the national level. Richard Spencer (avowed White Nationalist) set that one up. There was also a KKK rally a month earlier. These rallies set the stage for the Unite the Right rally. Anyone attending had to have known who they were uniting with by that point.Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
The Unite the Right rally was in August, and was set up by Jason Kessler. When a White Nationalist or Neo Nazi asks you to unite with them, literally in a rally to "Unite" with White Nationalists and KKK ... it says something about you if you accept. It says something about you when you march alongside those waving Nazi flags or chanting "The Jews will not replace us". Anyone worth a hill of beans would have left, or better yet, started counterprotesting the rally at that point. For what it's worth, most of the participants in Unite the Right rally seem to have figured this out, and declined to attend Unite the Right II also set up by Jason Kessler. Even Richard Spencer wasn't willing to associate with him at that point.
Anyone who wished to protest the removal of the statue without uniting with White Nationalists and KKK in the Unite the Right rally had ample time to have their own seperate rally where they could control the messaging. It was not, and is not, a time critical issue.Comment
-
Specifically in regards to the claim that what I am doing is a double standard ... I would say the same about ANY group that willfully rallies with a hate group that organized the rally whether left or right or otherwise.
In regards to it being McCarthyism ... that's absurd. I am not saying there should be legal or government action against anyone involved. Only that there is a very real implication to marching beside a hate group in their rally, especially when it's LITERALLY a rally to "unite" with them.Comment
-
So the media showed footage of a neo-Nazi rally from May alongside Trump's comment about a protest in favor of a statue in August. That doesn't help their case. Why do you assume everyone supporting the statue attended because they liked neo-Nazis? You're doing what the media did, you're quoting the neo-Nazi chant from May to smear people protesting the statue's removal in August. There is strength in numbers, if you want to protest doing it by yourself wont be heard as loud as joining a thousand people. The one man march cant compare to the million man march - and speaking of the latter, Louis Farrakhan organized that. Do you condemn all the people who showed up?Originally posted by Aeson View Post
If you supported the statue and heard a protest was this weekend you'd attend without knowing or caring who else was coming. That doesn't make you a neo-Nazi anymore than attending a free speech rally makes you a communist because commies showed up. But it would in Joe McCarthy's mind.
McCarthyism employed a guilt by association you are using to smear the 'fine people' there to protest the removal of a statue, neo-Nazis were a minority of the protesters. It doesn't matter if the government was involved, the smear is the same. And I'll say it again, when Trump said there were fine people on both sides he also specifically excluded neo-Nazis and white supremacists. But the media edits that out because they cant show Trump condemning neo-Nazis when the media is claiming he said they were fine people.Specifically in regards to the claim that what I am doing is a double standard ... I would say the same about ANY group that willfully rallies with a hate group that organized the rally whether left or right or otherwise.
In regards to it being McCarthyism ... that's absurd. I am not saying there should be legal or government action against anyone involved. Only that there is a very real implication to marching beside a hate group in their rally, especially when it's LITERALLY a rally to "unite" with them.
Comment
Comment