If Bill had paid off bimbos to keep quiet, wouldn’t we not know about them?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Witch Hunt Revealed
Collapse
X
-
“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
-
-
Originally posted by pchang View PostIf Bill had paid off bimbos to keep quiet, wouldn’t we not know about them?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnT View Post
You may wish to charge the Clinton's some healthy rental fees for all that space they are taking up in your head.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostHillary bought dirt on Trump from the Russians, did her hubby Bill pay off some of his 'bimbos' to keep quiet?
Again I went through this with you. Hillary didn't buy anything from the Russians. The DNC employed a US based firm that was originally paid by antiTrump republicans. You don't have any proof of anything.
You don't quite grasp the fact that Trump violated tax and election laws. The Clintons did not.
Keep grasping at the straws!Last edited by Giancarlo; August 25, 2018, 04:48.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
I personally dont care about them, its the partisan hypocrisy I dont like... Democrats defended the Clintons while screaming bloody murder about Trump for doing effectively the same things.
Stop trying to play both sides. It doesn't work and looks dishonest. The Clintons didn't effectively do the same things as Trump. Not even close.
Wrong on all counts. Oh and if you feel that the Clintons did something wrong or illegal, call the DOJ. Sessions is running the same DOJ that is leading many of these criminal prosecutions against Trump's cohorts.
The fact is Trump and his cohorts violated a plethora of laws in just this matter (not counting other violations committed). Hillary never violated the law. She was investigated multiple times by republicans who spent millions investigating her and nothing came of it. Republicans spent nearly $100 million on her and her hubby... And did diddly squat.
Maybe you should be asking republicans why they spent so much tax payer money on investigating the Clintons, who have never been charged with anything. Believe me, if Hillary or Bill did anything illegal they would have prosecuted them ages ago.
You have nothing.Last edited by Giancarlo; August 25, 2018, 04:54.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Republicans love throwing stones from glass houses. Two republican House members that called for more investigations into the Clintons were indicted in this past month alone. One for insider trading and securities fraud and the other and his wife for misusing $250,000 in campaign funds. Both face decades in prison.
Have whatever feelings you want about the Clintons. They didn't do anything remotely similar and they followed the law. If they didn't republicans would have prosecuted them ages ago.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Giancarlo View Post
but... Hillary.
Again I went through this with you. Hillary didn't buy anything from the Russians. The DNC employed a US based firm that was originally paid by antiTrump republicans. You don't have any proof of anything.
You don't quite grasp the fact that Trump violated tax and election laws. The Clintons did not.
Keep grasping at the straws!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Giancarlo View PostWhat partisan hypocrisy? The Clintons didn't violate the law, while the Trump organization and Trump himself did. That is why there may be criminal charges filed against the Trump organization. Plus I think they uncovered other illegal activity, such as tax fraud, bank fraud and tax evasion.
Stop trying to play both sides. It doesn't work and looks dishonest. The Clintons didn't effectively do the same things as Trump. Not even close.
Wrong on all counts. Oh and if you feel that the Clintons did something wrong or illegal, call the DOJ. Sessions is running the same DOJ that is leading many of these criminal prosecutions against Trump's cohorts.
The fact is Trump and his cohorts violated a plethora of laws in just this matter (not counting other violations committed). Hillary never violated the law. She was investigated multiple times by republicans who spent millions investigating her and nothing came of it. Republicans spent nearly $100 million on her and her hubby... And did diddly squat.
Maybe you should be asking republicans why they spent so much tax payer money on investigating the Clintons, who have never been charged with anything. Believe me, if Hillary or Bill did anything illegal they would have prosecuted them ages ago.
You have nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostThere may be? Trump 'colluded' with Russians, Hillary 'colluded' with Russians. ...
She paid a Washington based investigation firm to complete a dossier that already was ordered by parts of the GOP (those who wanted to prevent Trump from becoming presidential candidate) but lacked funding to be completed.
Employing US based companies in order to find dirt on your opponjent isn't "colluding with the russians", not even if the employee tasked with the investigation uses russian contacts in order to gather information.
Holding a meeting with a russian lawyer from which, upfront, it is known that she is directly linkied with the russian government, in order to get dirt on your opponent, is colluding however.Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
There may be? Trump 'colluded' with Russians, Hillary 'colluded' with Russians. Trump didn't get the dirt on Hillary, wikileaks got it. Hillary did get the dirt on Trump. Maybe the reason why Sessions wont go after Hillary for collusion is because it aint illegal to get dirt on your political opponents. I'll bet when Mueller files his report we wont see a recommendation for criminal prosecution for the Trump campaign on that score...
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Berzerker logic:
1. I have meetings with Russians,
2. Therefore I colluded with Russians
3. You hire a research firm
4. The research firm subcontracts part of the work out to a Brit
5. The Brit asks a few Russians questions
6. You just colluded with Russians
... one is not like the other. As I said before, Trump's actions are like hiring a hit man to kill someone, Hillary's actions are like contracting a plumber who then subcontracts the job out to a guy who participates in a work-release program at the local county jail and has one of those guys assist him.
There is literally no equivalence, Berzerker. None. And you lessen yourself every time you trot your tired and bad analogy out here.
Comment
Comment