The Witch Hunt Revealed

[Kidlicious]

Whose rules? Are you talking about a federal law?

Yes. It's a violation of federal law and it's against the rules of the State Department.

[giblets]

Ok, which federal law(s)?

[Kidlicious]

Ok, which federal law(s)?

The Espionage Act of 1913

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

[Broken_Erika]

[Kidlicious]

You're comparing this to presidents pardoning people?

[Proteus_MST]

Of course ... it is exactly the scenario you described ... Elites getting away with crimes due to a corrupt government.
Trump is part of the government ... and the presidential pardons are edicts issued by the govvernment ... and Trumps "friends" who receive the pardons are "elites" and not "normal people"

[Kidlicious]

No comparison. Pardons are of the system. Those people were charged for their crimes. Hilary was never indicted.

[Ming]

So go Jail HIllary, and the Trumps, and let's nail Donny for inciting a riot and the overthrow of this country. Lock em all up.

[giblets]

The Espionage Act of 1913

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Hillary is a spy?

[Kidlicious]

Hillary is a spy?

She was grossly negligent which make her guilty according to the law. A violation includes things like taking pictures without authorization, which is what other people have been charged for.

[Ming]

She was grossly negligent which make her guilty according to the law. A violation includes things like taking pictures without authorization, which is what other people have been charged for.

And so was Trump and his family... so lock them all up.

[Dauphin]

I would think a better critique is how a law from 1913 covers e-mail accounts and servers.

[Uncle Sparky]

The founding fathers were very wise. And before you 'claim' the founding fathers weren't around in 1913, I have proof. But I don't have to show you.

[Kidlicious]

And so was Trump and his family... so lock them all up.

Nope. You're making things up or something. You've got nothing on them. HRC is guilty and never was indicted. Comey lied for her because Obama's AG told him they weren't going to charge her.

[Kidlicious]

I would think a better critique is how a law from 1913 covers e-mail accounts and servers.

Because she had classified material on her private servers. That violates that law.

[Dauphin]

Most of us would be in breach of laws if we used personal accounts for corporate, and certainly government activity. Hard to see how Hilary isn’t guilty. I just don’t know which laws should be applicable. A law from 1913 seems a stretch.

[Kidlicious]

Most of us would be in breach of laws if we used personal accounts for corporate, and certainly government activity. Hard to see how Hilary isn’t guilty. I just don’t know which laws should be applicable. A law from 1913 seems a stretch.

Well that's what they were investigating her for. She only didn't get indicted because Comey said she is too stupid to understand electronics. But we now know that she received warnungs.

[Ming]

Nope. You're making things up or something. You've got nothing on them. HRC is guilty and never was indicted. Comey lied for her because Obama's AG told him they weren't going to charge her.

No... not made up at all. Ivanka was using her own personal email account and phone to conduct White House business.
That is against the law. She is guilty and was never indicted. FACT. So lock them all up.

[Kidlicious]

No... not made up at all. Ivanka was using her own personal email account and phone to conduct White House business.
That is against the law. She is guilty and was never indicted. FACT. So lock them all up.

It's not the same thing. You aren't getting it. HRC received 2 warnings. She was informed that she was breaking the law and putting national security at risk. Assange got her emails because of her gross negligence.

Ivanka was not indicted because she wasn't aware of what she was doing.

But you want her to go to prison because Orange Man Bad.