Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thread for obviously newsworthy stuff

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    When a judge orders you to answer questions under oath, that's not the GOP. That's not a witch hunt. There is plenty of evidence of her guilt. Go learn how proper investigations are done in a functioning democracy.
    She already was under 2 proper investigations which were much more expensive and took more time than the Mueller investigation and yielded no results.
    In contrast to this the Mueller investigation (also a proper investigation btw.) didn't take too muich time to uncover the first guilty people in the Trump campaign

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    When a judge orders you to answer questions under oath, that's not the GOP. That's not a witch hunt. There is plenty of evidence of her guilt. Go learn how proper investigations are done in a functioning democracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Crooked Hillary has to answer questions under oath regarding email scandal. Could be trouble for BO.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...out-her-emails
    AFAIK not the first time she has to answer questions under oath
    Just more money wasted by the GOP-witch hunt into her ... in order to distract from the looming Mueller investigation into the Trump campaign and all the crimes it has yet to uncover

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    Kid just came in his pants. Early of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Crooked Hillary has to answer questions under oath regarding email scandal. Could be trouble for BO.

    Hillary Clinton must answer more questions under oath regarding her emails, a conservative watchdog group declared Wednesday. "Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q's about the setting up of her email system," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton tweeted after a hearing in federal court. U.S. District

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    commented on 's reply
    And I guess the fact that he was arrested doesn't mean that the police have any evidence to her.

  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Stormy also does not believe women without evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnT
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20181115_104914.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	190.6 KB
ID:	9365455

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    I do love how that kid felt that Kav was innocent until proven guilty after the accusation.
    but just being accused makes Avenatti guilty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    No. Avenatti has been charged with a felony. She is beat up. The difference is that there is evidence against him you liar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Creepy Porn Lawyer does not believe all women.
    You know what the difference between him and someone like Kavanaugh is?

    Arvenatti:
    I am looking forward to a full investigation at which point I am confident that I will be fully exonerated,


    Arvenatti is loking forward to the investigation ... total contrast to someone like Kavanaugh, who desperately wants to avoid a full investigation into the accusations

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Creepy Porn Lawyer does not believe all women.
    Creepy republicans assault women.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    The Invaders have arrived. Don't think they walked.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Creepy Porn Lawyer does not believe all women.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X