Thread for obviously newsworthy stuff

[Kidlicious]

In contrast to you I gave a link that supports my claim.
Do you have a link that supports your claim (that the judge didn't base hios ruling on violation of the 5th amendment)?

Do you have any clue how stupid it is to think that reporters have a constitutional right to be at the press conference?

[ZEE]

There was just a shooting at a Chicago Hospital.

[Dinner]

The 5th amendment has to do with crimes only. CNN is fake news.

Jesus Christ...

[ZEE]

I want to see soem damn links and citations, from everybody, RIGHT NOW.

[Proteus_MST]

Bull****. You reported that FROM CNN. Fake news. The judge did not make that ruling. He ruled that the WH did not use due process, but he used another case as precedent. It's not the same thing as saying that reporters have a right to be at a press conference.

In contrast to you I gave a link that supports my claim.
Do you have a link that supports your claim (that the judge didn't base hios ruling on violation of the 5th amendment)?

[Kidlicious]

The 5th amendment is a constitutional right ... and you claimed that the judge ruled that no constitutional right was violated ... so you spread fake news

Bull****. You reported that FROM CNN. Fake news. The judge did not make that ruling. He ruled that the WH did not use due process, but he used another case as precedent. It's not the same thing as saying that reporters have a right to be at a press conference.

[Proteus_MST]

The 5th amendment has to do with crimes only. CNN is fake news.

The 5th amendment is a constitutional right ... and you claimed that the judge ruled that no constitutional right was violated ... so you spread fake news

[Kidlicious]

Wrong. According to the Article:


And yes, of course, CNN, what would you expect me to use? Breitbart? ... I prefer to read real news

The 5th amendment has to do with crimes only. CNN is fake news.

[Proteus_MST]

You use CNN.

No constitutional rights were violated. That wasn't the ruling.

Wrong. According to the Article:

... Judge Timothy J. Kelly ruled on Fifth Amendment grounds, saying Acosta's right to due process had been violated. ...

And yes, of course, CNN, what would you expect me to use? Breitbart? ... I prefer to read real news

[rah]

Since you're a sheeple for FOX

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-will-not-seek-to-remove-cnn-reporter-jim-acostas-credential

[Kidlicious]

And CNN already has informed the district court about the plans of the WH to violate the 1st and 5ths amendments again

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/19/m...ing/index.html

You use CNN.

No constitutional rights were violated. That wasn't the ruling.

[pchang]

And then the WH backed down. So much winning!!!

[Proteus_MST]

The WH has informed CNN that Acosta will be suspended again in two weeks.

And CNN already has informed the district court about the plans of the WH to violate the 1st and 5ths amendments again

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/19/media/cnn-acosta-emergency-hearing/index.html

[Kidlicious]

The WH has informed CNN that Acosta will be suspended again in two weeks.

[rah]

An article about the unbelievable intellectual archievements/capabilities of Donald Trump and his trusted advisors

Old news. But still funny. I'm sure Kid will claim that he's smarter than anybody here.