Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Baffled by Charlottesville

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Baffled by Charlottesville

    First, let me say that I know the troll twins are going to be all over this, and I can't prevent that. Okay. But, AS A COURTESY, if you're going to tell them they're morons with reprehensible views, please do so by commenting on their posts, not replying. This should prevent the main thread conversation being drowned out by pages and pages of "[horrible opinion backed up by nonsensical claims]" "your opinions are horrible, and backed up by nonsensical claims!" ad infinitum. If you want to do that, I accept that such is your right, and only ask that you don't do so in a way that renders the thread unusable for any other purpose. Thank you.

    With that said: I don't really understand why any part of the Charlottesville brawl needed to happen. So, these Nazis/Confederates/People too stupid to see inconsistency in identifying as Nazifederates (hereafter "Nazis") are butthurt about people wanting to wreck their treason monument. Right? So they plan a protest march where they'll all hang around yelling slogans to . . . okay, I'm not totally clear on why people bother to protest either, it doesn't do anything, but it makes sense to them, because they're Nazis, and Nazis are by and large ****ing idiots (some are not stupid, only grossly immoral and fond of causing trouble or selling swastika merchandise to their idiot friends). They announce in advance that they are going to be milling around pretending they represent more than 5% of the American population (generous estimate). If left alone, at some point, they would have gotten bored and gone home to be doxxed and lose their jobs (I assume they would be dumb enough to post their own footage), the statues would have come down anyway, and the Nazis would have gone back to their online slimeholes to whine about how persecuted they are. If instead they had chosen to cause trouble or attack black people, it would have been relatively simple for police to stop them.

    But this did not happen. Instead they had a whole horde of other people who said it was necessary to stand up to these Nazi punks. There is ample past precedent to show that whenever hard-leftists and alt-rightists get together in big angry crowds, violence results. So, unless the anti-Nazis were even dumber than the Nazis, they should have expected more or less exactly what happened. Which is to say, chaos. There was an enormous front of people edging together and periodically throwing punches/rocks/pepper spray. The counterprotesters seem to have outnumbered the protesters by two to one or thereabouts. Fifteen hundred people in conflict. Police couldn't contain them, and they had to be broken up by soldiers.

    It's not that it's okay for Nazis to beat up people who get in their face. But . . . they got right up in the face of a large, angry group of people who hated them, in a situation that has happened many times before. They couldn't have expected the car attack, but any time that much raw anger is sloshing around, violence will result. What the hell did they expect to happen? What was the purpose of being there at all, if not to street-fight? To send the message that white supremacists are bad? Everybody knows that already. A recent poll found that substantial majorities of Americans across all demographics disapproved of white supremacists, white nationalists, and the KKK. There was variation based on the term used, but this appeared to be caused by poorly-informed respondents not knowing what the specific term used (e.g., "alt-right") entailed and saying "not sure."

    1011 1100
    Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

  • #2
    Large portions of the US oppose white supremacists and yet the country still managed to elect a president who spearheaded the birther movement and fanned the flames of racial/ethnic animosity to get into office.

    I can understand why some people think we might need reminders that this stuff is not okay.
    Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
    "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

    Comment


    • #3
      Fcourse I dunno about specific US issues with this, so my...errm... expertise on this is mostly net/TV based:

      In general I do agree that often large media coverage or even counter-action just gives them freaks more attention than they deserve. From a purely democratic perspective tho, everyone has the right to go on a demo, so I could see why a number of ppl are simply unwilling to surrender the public sphere to Alt-Right/Nazis/whatever without a counter-demo.

      On a more specifc note, what I am wondering though that the police did not seem to be out in force from the beginning to separate the two groups (at least that is my impression, it's entirely possible that I missed something). That would be the usual practice here (worthless note how stuff is done elsewhere), though it does not always work.
      Blah

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Elok View Post
        The counterprotesters seem to have outnumbered the protesters by two to one or thereabouts. Fifteen hundred people in conflict. Police couldn't contain them, and they had to be broken up by soldiers.
        How many police were available, and did they plan for a confrontation scenario by drafting in nearby support or specialist protest containment units? Were the police who were there trained in riot and protest control?

        Trump said the Alt-Right organizers had a permit - if true (which given the source is probably not), surely safety and policing would have formed a part of the decision?
        One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

        Comment


        • #5
          But there's a substantial gap between the tacit racism of the birther movement and literal, undisguised white supremacy. As in, straight-up yelling about Jews controlling the world to eliminate white people. Nazis are so unquestionably bad that we use them as stock villains in movies, even Star Wars movies that take place in another galaxy. Hitler is a cliche of evil, the yardstick every other bad person is automatically measured against or compared to. And if you think the gas chambers, torture, mass graves, brutal wars of conquest, etc. were either okay or else fabrications by probably-Jewish liars, are you really going to be convinced by the sight of some strangers engaging in fisticuffs in the street?

          XPost. It's unclear (to me) what the police were doing while all this was going on. Some reports say they tried to break it up, others that they largely stood back and let the two sides wail on each other until they had an excuse to declare it unlawful and clear the streets. Either way, it's a lot harder to keep an eye on five hundred people all on the same side than a 1500-person melee. Actual footage I've seen shows the two sides maybe five feet apart screaming at each other, with rocks flying and occasionally one person from either side dancing out to swing a punch or stick, then dart back. I don't know if this was while all available units were busy containing trouble elsewhere, or if the cops just said "screw it, I'm not getting whacked with a club trying to break these jackasses up" and stood back entirely.
          Last edited by Elok; August 18, 2017, 14:09.
          1011 1100
          Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

          Comment


          • #6
            Also, UK police are well versed in keeping 70,000 fans and opposing team fans who may become hooligans at a football match in check. 1,500 is a small number.
            One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

            Comment


            • #7
              American police are kind of crap at de-escalation, I grant you. If not Americans in general.
              1011 1100
              Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

              Comment


              • #8
                I have read some supports of antifa, here is a criticism: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...t-left/534192/

                Somewhere I read about a group of liberal pastors/etc who had linked arms and were doing a pacifist counter protest were attacked by alt-right groups and ended up defended by antifa (when the police did nothing).

                It has also been repeatedly pointed out that if a group demonstrates violently and shows strength, that it can have a chilling effect on the discourse and a small group can dominate

                This was over 500 perople, a couple of years ago when such protests would get ~10 people I agree that ignoring it would be (and was) the right response.

                JM
                Jon Miller-
                I AM.CANADIAN
                GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                Comment


                • #9
                  People have pointed out that other cities (like Seattle) would have had police that were more proactive to keep the situation from escalating.

                  JM
                  Jon Miller-
                  I AM.CANADIAN
                  GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Here is some of the perspective in defence of antifa:


                    JM
                    Jon Miller-
                    I AM.CANADIAN
                    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Dauphin View Post

                      How many police were available, and did they plan for a confrontation scenario by drafting in nearby support or specialist protest containment units? Were the police who were there trained in riot and protest control?

                      Trump said the Alt-Right organizers had a permit - if true (which given the source is probably not), surely safety and policing would have formed a part of the decision?

                      I'm in several Virginia-related gun groups on FB(or at least I was until FB started racking down). The number of Virginia LEOs who say really ****ty things about minorities and people to the left of them(which is not the same thing as "liberal" or "leftist") I see is amazing.

                      There really is no doubt in my mind that the VSP wasn't in the mood to put the damper on groups that the rank and file may have sympathized with. Our governor decided to blame the whole thing on:

                      (1)The ACLU and

                      (2)The protestors being "more heavily armed" than the police with "80% of them having semiautomatic weapons"(the percentage being clearly false to anyone who looked at photos of the protestors). He was acting as if the VSP were armed with ****in' SAA revolvers and lever-actions or something. He also claimed that the alt-reich protestors had weapons caches all over town, the head of the VSP disputed that claim.

                      Rather than address the severe systemic problem of the VSP being racist cowards with MRAPs and machine guns, he decided to push his anti-RKBA agenda and also blame the ACLU.
                      Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        If left alone, at some point, they would have gotten bored and gone home to be doxxed and lose their jobs (I assume they would be dumb enough to post their own footage)
                        I really don't understand this. Do you sincerely think that white supremacists, KKK's, and extreme right-wingers just are a bunch of hillbillies ? It's probably true that they are the foot soldiers that get beaten up in confrontations (which they probably find sheer entertaining), but there are lots of academics, clerics, politicians and like that control it.

                        You can't ignore these idiots to their silent death. You need to confront them. The best way is to peacefully confront them every time they stick their ugly head up.
                        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                        Steven Weinberg

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Own the microphone. If they have 500 demonstrators, you should have a few thousand. Shout them down. If the racist scum feel bad, let them. If they send one of yours to the hospital, send ten of theirs to the morgue. This is a traditional Winnipeg way of dealing with fascists, and hopefully we won't need to do it again.

                          I'm currently reading about those marchers on the right being 'outed' and named by friends and families who saw them on TV and in stills and videos. They are sad, because some of them are being ostracised by family and newly-former co-workers. Poor fellows. Just because you want to kill a race or religion doesn't mean you're not a good person, according to Trump. I personally have no problem with killing Nazis... My dad trained people who did this !
                          There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Perhaps this sentiment:

                            The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
                            “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                            ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It has also been repeatedly pointed out that if a group demonstrates violently and shows strength, that it can have a chilling effect on the discourse and a small group can dominate
                              I've been to many protests where there would be maybe 10 protestors and 500+ 'anti'-protestors. The best approach is the following.

                              1, if you're going to counterprotest don't try to flood/swarm people at the protest. You won't improve your image and you'll just exacerbate things. Worst case, you end up killing one of the protestors in the scuffle. The less control you have over the protest the more likely bad things will happen.

                              2, stand back, let them say what they have to say, keep a respectful distance and don't challenge bystanders engaging with the protesters. You're not there to escalate things. People have a right to view the protest without being harassed by you.

                              3. Don't bring bats, weapons, etc - especially if you are the larger group responding to a protest. Again - it will destroy sympathy.

                              Antifa did all 3, bad things happened. From what I can see the entire protest was a total ****show.

                              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X