True... It almost seems like he knows he's going to get his *** kicked, so he's not even going to put the expected organization in place, and spend the least money possible.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why are the betting markets...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostTrue... It almost seems like he knows he's going to get his *** kicked, so he's not even going to put the expected organization in place, and spend the least money possible.
I haven't seen a candidate this bad ever. It is like he doesn't want to win. Maybe he saw the salary of the President and wasn't impressed. So now he is trying to be as self destructive as possible.
This Missouri senate race basically sums up how destructive Trump is being:
ST. LOUIS (AP) — Ask Republican Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri about his party's presidential nominee and you'll likely get a polite but weary response.
An incumbent sitting Republican is now under serious threat by an insurgent democrat in a shockingly tight race. A democrat who is a war veteran to top it off. I could see many moderate Republicans voting for him. Trump, with his five military deferments, has proven he doesn't like military veterans.Last edited by Giancarlo; August 15, 2016, 08:09.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
The leaked emails from democrats are nothing compared to this bombshell:
For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Giancarlo View PostThe leaked emails from democrats are nothing compared to this bombshell:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/15...?_r=1&referer=
Unlike the Clinton Foundation...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostNahhhh... It doesn't tie directly to the Trumpster. The Trumpster wasn't the one being bribed or giving influence.
Unlike the Clinton Foundation...
Trump republicans love throwing stones at the Clinton foundation. They seem to hate charity.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
I know you are not a Trump Republican. I thought you were being sarcastic though lol.
There is nothing there on the Clinton foundation. People need to move on from that.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
I am not a Republican of any type and I would 'throw stones' at the Clinton Foundation.
The Clintons (Bill, Hillary, their Foundation) are a big part of the problem in the US.
The bigger part is the forces (Misinformation, pandering, tribalism, anti-intellectualism, etc) that created Trump on the right.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
I don't view a well respected and well liked former President as a problem. Now, I think there could have been a better option than Hillary, but she isn't the problem. Nor is the Clinton foundation. The Republicans who hold Congress are.
Edit: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...-trump/495755/
They pay more in taxes than many. 30% of their income was paid in taxes. The Clinton's aren't the problem. Mitt Romney revealed he paid 13-14% of his income in taxes in 2012. Trump probably pays less than that (which is why he is being audited most likely).
The Clinton's may make more money than we can imagine, but they pay their dues. And they don't exploit tax loopholes. And they have been transparent about their tax returns. Every single one since 1977 has been released. Go look at them.
Donald Trump once criticized Mitt Romney for not releasing his and hiding something. That will haunt him.Last edited by Giancarlo; August 15, 2016, 11:11.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
When Obama "retires" I would have no problems with a Obama foundation. Even if he treated it as a quasi Lobbying organization. He will still hold some influence and be able to make a few phone calls or twist arms. It's not like Michelle will be running for office. And if it was just Bill, I wouldn't have a problem with the Clinton foundation. But it's not just Bill. Hillary is still quite active and while there is no proof of any influence peddling, the possibility exists and it makes it look shady.
When you're running for the highest office in the land, you want to avoid ALL things that could be looked at as "shady".It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostWhen Obama "retires" I would have no problems with a Obama foundation. Even if he treated it as a quasi Lobbying organization. He will still hold some influence and be able to make a few phone calls or twist arms. It's not like Michelle will be running for office. And if it was just Bill, I wouldn't have a problem with the Clinton foundation. But it's not just Bill. Hillary is still quite active and while there is no proof of any influence peddling, the possibility exists and it makes it look shady.
When you're running for the highest office in the land, you want to avoid ALL things that could be looked at as "shady".
If there is no proof, there is no fire.
Trump, on the other hand... Well... Is more shady that a used car salesman selling totaled vehicles with clean titles.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
stop comparing her to TRUMP. With the exception of a couple of loons, everyone here already agrees with that.
Saying someone is not as bad as Trump isn't necessarily a ringing endorsement.
And Where did I say there was any proof? No where.
Maybe if she avoided some of these "SHADY" associations, one of her biggest weaknesses. (being untrustworthy) wouldn't be that big of a weakness.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View Poststop comparing her to TRUMP. With the exception of a couple of loons, everyone here already agrees with that.
Saying someone is not as bad as Trump isn't necessarily a ringing endorsement.
And Where did I say there was any proof? No where.
Maybe if she avoided some of these "SHADY" associations, one of her biggest weaknesses. (being untrustworthy) wouldn't be that big of a weakness.
I need actual proof. Not stuff that has been repeated for years. To me its just hearsay.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
Comment