Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bill Maher: Islam is inherently worse than other religions.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • i find this debate a little strange. if we accept that both muslims and christians have justified violence based on their faith (and of course we might say that more muslims do so today, but we can still see examples of christians doing the same), then we can say both faiths can be used to justify violence. a debate about whether there is textual justification for such violence seems beside the point.
    "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

    "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

    Comment


    • Disagree. The written texts, in this case, represent the highest authority for each religion; the constitution, if you will.
      No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

      Comment


      • I don't see Islam any more evil or violent than Christianity was at the same age.
        Founder of The Glory of War, CHAMPIONS OF APOLYTON!!!
        1992-Perot , 1996-Perot , 2000-Bush , 2004-Bush :|, 2008-Obama :|, 2012-Obama , 2016-Clinton , 2020-Biden

        Comment


        • Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
          Disagree. The written texts, in this case, represent the highest authority for each religion; the constitution, if you will.
          the argument being put forward here is that islam is worse than other religions (and considering the context, we can take christianity as the most relevant other religion), because of what is written in the koran, and how it compares unfavourably to the new testament. my point is that considering the violence that has been committed in the name of both religions, the textual debate seems meaningless, or at least irrelevant.

          or to put it another way, if violence is committed in the name of god/allah, does it matter what textual support there is for said violence?
          "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

          "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

          Comment


          • Given how young Scientology is I'm surprised they aren't blowing up buildings or anything.

            Comment


            • Yeah. The Young Religion argument appears to require a cultural vacuum.
              No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
                Disagree. The written texts, in this case, represent the highest authority for each religion; the constitution, if you will.
                Yep. When someone uses violence despite their religion teaching it is wrong then you can truthfully say they're not following their religion. If their religion teaches violence, saying it is not only ok but that god demands you do violence, then that is an entirely different (and incurable) problem.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by AAAAAAAAH! View Post
                  Given how young Scientology is I'm surprised they aren't blowing up buildings or anything.
                  A better example might be the Baha'i Faith.
                  No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                  Comment


                  • Half the Christians I know are real Old Testament types. An eye for an eye, all that BS.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by AAAAAAAAH! View Post
                      Given how young Scientology is I'm surprised they aren't blowing up buildings or anything.
                      Well, they have infiltrated the FBI, framed opponents for terrorism, and been implicated in child labor, general labor violations, false imprisonment, forced abortions, abuse and neglect of minors, and sundry financial shadiness and harassment. There's just not much money in blowing **** up, unless your name is Lockheed Martin or something and you have a government contract.

                      EDIT: Forgot lots and lots of practicing medicine without a license. That'n's big, arguably all there is to Scientology.
                      Last edited by Elok; September 14, 2014, 20:38.
                      1011 1100
                      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                        Yep. When someone uses violence despite their religion teaching it is wrong then you can truthfully say they're not following their religion. If their religion teaches violence, saying it is not only ok but that god demands you do violence, then that is an entirely different (and incurable) problem.
                        but why does that matter? the problem is the violence and if the violence is being committed in the name of religion, then the textual support, or lack thereof, matters not.
                        "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                        "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                          but why does that matter? the problem is the violence and if the violence is being committed in the name of religion, then the textual support, or lack thereof, matters not.
                          Is it conceivable that the textual support would sway people who would otherwise not commit acts of violence?
                          John Brown did nothing wrong.

                          Comment


                          • The "textual support" for peace in the new testament has not prevented Christian nations from committing the worst atrocities in the past ~500 years.
                            In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Felch View Post
                              Is it conceivable that the textual support would sway people who would otherwise not commit acts of violence?
                              i suppose it's conceivable; i doubt it's true though.
                              "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                              "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                                i suppose it's conceivable; i doubt it's true though.
                                Explain suicide bomber then.
                                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X