Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Women apparently still don't like the GOP's war on women.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    Companies spend billions of dollars every year trying to comply with laws and regulations. There are so many it isn't actually possible to comply with them all. At any given moment every company in America is probably violating a dozen labor laws. The whole system is a ****ing mess, and it's a death by a thousand cuts--no individual rule is the one that makes it so expensive, it's the fact that there are so many of them. You really need a good positive reason to have a rule before you put it in place. Unfortunately, too many people think like sava and say "well it causes no harm!" It does cause harm. It causes harm simply by existing in the books. For some rules, the harm is worth it. For most, it isn't. This is why people who say "We need more regulation!" are out of their minds--"more" regulation is meaningless. You need good regulation, not more.
    Give examples
    In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

    Comment


    • #32
      There is a big problem with illegal Mexican foremen, employed illegal by agricultural companies, taking advantage of poor women mostly from Mexico. Many of them have spent their life's savings just to get here illegally and so they're desperate for a job and then the Mexican illegal men who got their first and who are in a position to say who gets hired or not demand sex in exchange for for letting the women work. Of course, none of this would happen if they weren't all criminal illegal aliens but the agricultural companies must take part of the blame because they're looking the other way. If we're really honest then these companies should all have all of their assets seized and the shareholders imprisoned simply because they're knowingly hiring illegals. That won't happen though because America's political system is highly corrupt and people with money literally write the laws for their exclusive benefit.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #33
        Perhaps the solution is to grant them citizenship let them vote and deport Dinner to Mexico.
        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
          Companies spend billions of dollars every year trying to comply with laws and regulations. There are so many it isn't actually possible to comply with them all. At any given moment every company in America is probably violating a dozen labor laws. The whole system is a ****ing mess, and it's a death by a thousand cuts--no individual rule is the one that makes it so expensive, it's the fact that there are so many of them. You really need a good positive reason to have a rule before you put it in place. Unfortunately, too many people think like sava and say "well it causes no harm!" It does cause harm. It causes harm simply by existing in the books. For some rules, the harm is worth it. For most, it isn't. This is why people who say "We need more regulation!" are out of their minds--"more" regulation is meaningless. You need good regulation, not more.

          The world's smallest violin is playing for the (not so) poor corporations forced to live under the rule of jackboot thugs they put into office.

          You are a massive idiot and completely disingenuous. The only "good" regulation in your mind is one that doesn't exist.
          To us, it is the BEAST.

          Comment


          • #35
            The only "good" regulation in your mind is one that doesn't exist.
            Personally I think the law restricting professions like medicine and law to citizens and legal immigrants is a good one. But apparently California disagrees with me.
            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

            Comment


            • #36
              I'd actually rather they restrict medicine to people who have actually successfully studied medicine, regardless of their nationality.

              The bar (and most of the justice system) is just a self-perpetuating system whose main purpose is to boost lawyers' pay.
              Indifference is Bliss

              Comment


              • #37
                FTR: This would appear to be an example of a real War on Women (tm) being waged in a western country, ken. It even had the tacit support of the State who ignored evidence of the war (tm) going on in their own country: Rotherham: politics ‘imported from Pakistan’ fuelled sex abuse cover-up – MP
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                  But I thought Scott Walker was a shoe in for the White House?
                  H.C. also said the same sort of stuff about the former Republican governor of Virginia who is now on trial for taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes.
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Sava View Post
                    The world's smallest violin is playing for the (not so) poor corporations forced to live under the rule of jackboot thugs they put into office.

                    You are a massive idiot and completely disingenuous. The only "good" regulation in your mind is one that doesn't exist.
                    Women suffer from overregulation. Stop waging a War on Women you KKK lover!
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Sava View Post
                      The world's smallest violin is playing for the (not so) poor corporations forced to live under the rule of jackboot thugs they put into office.

                      You are a massive idiot and completely disingenuous. The only "good" regulation in your mind is one that doesn't exist.
                      These things are what drive up unemployment and send companies overseas. It's not about pity for the companies, it's pity for the fact that we have hundreds of thousands of people who should have jobs but don't because of stupid rules.
                      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                      ){ :|:& };:

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                        These things are what drive up unemployment and send companies overseas. It's not about pity for the companies, it's pity for the fact that we have hundreds of thousands of people who should have jobs but don't because of stupid rules.
                        It's sad that you believe that.

                        But funny, nevertheless.
                        To us, it is the BEAST.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I'd actually rather they restrict medicine to people who have actually successfully studied medicine, regardless of their nationality.
                          As an illegal immigrant? Interesting. What this does is reduce the value of everyone in America who actually has certification.

                          The bar (and most of the justice system) is just a self-perpetuating system whose main purpose is to boost lawyers' pay.
                          Would you want your judge to not have passed the bar? Or to have passed the bar in another country, illegally immigrated into Argenchilea, and then was in charge of enforcing Argenchilean laws?

                          Seems bad to me, but I guess if you're used to colonialism I can see why you favor this.
                          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                            As an illegal immigrant? Interesting. What this does is reduce the value of everyone in America who actually has certification.
                            So does abolishing labour unions...

                            In any case, as long as the certification is valid, what does the legal residence status of the person affect his qualifications in the relevant fields? I'd rather be operated upon a licensed MD that entered the country illegally than by a legal resident that doen't know anything about medicine.



                            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                            Would you want your judge to not have passed the bar?
                            If he has the proper qualifications, I don't see how having taken an exam that measures memorization skills would affect this. After all, there's millions of people who have passed the bar who I wouldn't want to have as a judge either.

                            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                            Or to have passed the bar in another country, illegally immigrated into Argenchilea, and then was in charge of enforcing Argenchilean laws?
                            1) I wouln't care about them having passed the bar, that was my point. That it is pretty much an union.
                            2) You need more than having passed the bar to be a judge here. Like having political friends.

                            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                            Seems bad to me, but I guess if you're used to colonialism I can see why you favor this.
                            Just as much as you are to raping kids and murdering people whom you don't agree with!
                            Indifference is Bliss

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              So does abolishing labour unions
                              How? Labor unions are useless. There's no reason why a teacher's certification should be limited to just one state.

                              In any case, as long as the certification is valid, what does the legal residence status of the person affect his qualifications in the relevant fields?
                              In the case of law? He has to swear an oath to uphold the laws of the country. Also, having a judge who's an illegal immigrant is rather bad for ensuring that the laws of the country are actually enforced...

                              I'd rather be operated upon a licensed MD that entered the country illegally than by a legal resident that doen't know anything about medicine.
                              How is it proper to license someone if you aren't sure what their actual identity is?

                              If he has the proper qualifications, I don't see how having taken an exam that measures memorization skills would affect this. After all, there's millions of people who have passed the bar who I wouldn't want to have as a judge either.
                              So you're ok with someone who's not Argenchilean enforcing argenchilean laws on you. Interesting. This is no different from colonialism, Nestor.
                              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                How? Labor unions are useless.
                                They serve to increase members' wages through collective bargaining. If they were useless, then nobody would be against them. Clearly they have some effect.

                                You mentioned that allowing for immigrants with certifications being allowed to practise in the US would reduce the value of people with such certifications. This means that, by forbidding foreign certified people from practidsing, local certified people are inflating their wages. Not unlike labor unions.

                                In fact, such high wages very probably come hand-in-hand with high certification costs (or education); having people with such high-value education come into the country is a benefit.

                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                In the case of law? He has to swear an oath to uphold the laws of the country.
                                But I would gues that you'd have a judge swear a similar oath, no?

                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                Also, having a judge who's an illegal immigrant is rather bad for ensuring that the laws of the country are actually enforced...
                                Hm. I'd agree that a judge should not be an illegal immigrant


                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                How is it proper to license someone if you aren't sure what their actual identity is?
                                I would hazard that a doctor licenced in another country would have the appropiate documents certifying this? Like a medical degree diploma. Of course, I'd make sure that the issuing institution was reputable.

                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                So you're ok with someone who's not Argenchilean enforcing argenchilean laws on you.
                                As long as he could demonstrate he possesses the relevant knowledge and skills, and swore to uphold local laws, why not?

                                Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                                This is no different from colonialism, Nestor.
                                When we were a colony, local judges swore to uphold Spanish laws and ultimately answered to the king of Spain. I'd say it's rather different to swearing to uphold Argentine laws and ultimately answering to the constitution.
                                Indifference is Bliss

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X