The Mystery of Fashion

[regexcellent]

That is seriously one of the dumbest things I've ever read. BAWWWW I HAVE TO LOOK AT ADVERTISEMENTS, THAT GIVES ME THE RIGHT TO DESTROY PROPERTY

[Lorizael]

You're only required to look at advertisements if you want to interact with the world paid for by them.

Mind you, I'd much rather we lived in a world where we didn't have to pay for modern conveniences with advertisements.

[Sava]

reg loves the taste of corporate cock

[C0ckney]

That is seriously one of the dumbest things I've ever read. BAWWWW I HAVE TO LOOK AT ADVERTISEMENTS, THAT GIVES ME THE RIGHT TO DESTROY PROPERTY

public spaces are ours, if advertisers try to invade them with their bull****, it's our right to take action.

[Lorizael]

Advertisers "invade" public spaces by paying to do so. They're either paying private companies who own the space--in which case the space is not public--or they're paying the government--in which case they're paying you indirectly.

[Elok]

Unless and until you guys agree on a common framework for what constitutes a right, and where rights originate, I don't see that argument going anywhere fast.

[Lorizael]

Oh, that's easy: there are no rights.

[Bereta_Eder]

yes but paying doesn't give anyone the option to do what they want.

as it is impossible to feature 10 meter c0cks with the subtitle "come and get them in the c0ck bar" why is it unreasonable not to want to be flooded with anorexia neurosa, psychological deficiency complexes etc?

That's also a POV

[Lorizael]

as it is impossible to feature 10 meter c0cks with the subtitle "come and get them in the c0ck bar"

This should clearly be legal, too.

[Bereta_Eder]

well it isn't

[Sava]

It should be okay if you have a giant rooster on your sign.

[Main_Brain]

We need more accessible fashion and better fashion education. The crap people wear outside of their homes today is shameful. Stretch pants and a t-shirt are not "going out" clothes. They are "give up on life" clothes.

and Fashion agrees

[Him] whom wears Sweatpants has lost control over his Life

[C0ckney]

Advertisers "invade" public spaces by paying to do so. They're either paying private companies who own the space--in which case the space is not public--or they're paying the government--in which case they're paying you indirectly.

adverts are placed where they will be seen, otherwise there would be no point to them. in other words, they will be placed where people pass or congregate. whether that be in a private space, inevitably visible from public spaces, or in public spaces themselves. advertisers never asked our permission, **** them. if our 'representatives' sold our spaces to the highest bidder, **** them too.

[molly bloom]

The getups are spectacularly ugly--I assume gay fashion designers are to blame. .

Blame the homos. Typical.

They look too uncomfortable for women to inflict on their own sex

Ahem. Women will voluntarily squeeze into shoes too small with ludicrous heels and skirts too tight because (and I quote)


'It's an Agnes B.!'

I go shopping for clothes with women friends. I'm trusted because I tell the unvarnished truth....

[Lorizael]

adverts are placed where they will be seen, otherwise there would be no point to them. in other words, they will be placed where people pass or congregate. whether that be in a private space, inevitably visible from public spaces, or in public spaces themselves. advertisers never asked our permission, **** them. if our 'representatives' sold our spaces to the highest bidder, **** them too.

As I said above:

You're only required to look at advertisements if you want to interact with the world paid for by them.