Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supreme Court rules in favor of public legislative prayers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Here's hoping that those who are not religious, or are atheists, will not be compelled or feel pressure to pray along, if they do not wish to do so.
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

    Comment


    • #17
      now maybe the court can explain how telling children to pledge their allegiance to the state's God in a classroom is not coercive

      but I agree with the ruling, the tradition BS is just that and irrelevant to the establishment clause

      the establishment clause requires a law that forces or coerces participation, this looks like a preacher does the talking and everyone else can listen to or ignore the hypocrites praying in public

      well, Jesus called them hypocrites

      Comment


      • #18
        It's a pretty cut and dry case. There's no establishment going on (like with the Church of England for example), so this is protected by the "no law...prohibiting the free exercise thereof" part of the first amendment. Unless somebody is pressured or punished for not participating, the townspeople of Greece, NY still have a right to practice their religion even when they're out in public.
        John Brown did nothing wrong.

        Comment


        • #19
          premature ejaculation does not make molesting children ok, you sicko.
          I don't see why the anti-religion folks are in arms, unless they feel that public prayer ought to be illegal and banned. Do you feel this way Cockney?
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • #20
            so this is protected by the "no law...prohibiting the free exercise thereof" part of the first amendment.
            not if its on the taxpayers dime, and it is even if the preachers dont get $$$ cuz the politicians are doin it on our time

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
              now maybe the court can explain how telling children to pledge their allegiance to the state's God in a classroom is not coercive

              but I agree with the ruling, the tradition BS is just that and irrelevant to the establishment clause

              the establishment clause requires a law that forces or coerces participation, this looks like a preacher does the talking and everyone else can listen to or ignore the hypocrites praying in public
              Because apparently in the Town of Greece these prayer sessions are carried out on the day of session when citizens come before the assembly to try and get things like zoning issues and permits agreed. I wonder whether their chances of getting a fair hearing might be at all effected if they refuse to participate in the prayers? It's a pretty safe bet that at least the concern of refusing to participate in a ceremony that the assembly clearly embraces could coerce petitioners into feeling like they'd have to participate.

              Comment


              • #22
                The plaintiffs failed to prove that.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #23
                  This ruling is a major blow to organized religion.
                  “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                  "Capitalism ho!"

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
                    The plaintiffs failed to prove that.
                    No they didnt, the conservative judges just ignored it. Or to be more precise, it's impossible to prove that it happens, yet you'd have to be a moron to not recognize the possibility of it happening.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                      No they didn't,
                      In the opinion of the Court, they did.
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        There's a fantastic Dickens quote that applies to the Supremes.
                        AC2- the most active SMAC(X) community on the web.
                        JKStudio - Masks and other Art

                        No pasarán

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
                          In the opinion of the Court, they did.
                          No ****. Yet another one of these delicious 5/4's that are helping to make America such a united and outward looking place.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            not if its on the taxpayers dime, and it is even if the preachers dont get $$$ cuz the politicians are doin it on our time.
                            So the argument is because they are paid employees that means they can't engage in prayer? I don't see how that's remotely enforeceable. Insofar as it doesn't hinder their performance, I don't see why it's in the purview of the federal government to regulate these things.
                            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Weird to see Greece in the news. It's a kind of crappy town about 10-15 minutes from me, eastern suburb of Rochester.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                                Because apparently in the Town of Greece these prayer sessions are carried out on the day of session when citizens come before the assembly to try and get things like zoning issues and permits agreed. I wonder whether their chances of getting a fair hearing might be at all effected if they refuse to participate in the prayers? It's a pretty safe bet that at least the concern of refusing to participate in a ceremony that the assembly clearly embraces could coerce petitioners into feeling like they'd have to participate.
                                hell, thats worse than Judge Roy Moore's 10 Commandments monument outside the courtroom down in Bama

                                but I doubt all the little people with business before them are in the room during the prayer, much less eyed by some keeper of the faith looking for non-believers to screw

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X