Nobody cares what a dummy like you thinks Ben. I love that I can write these comments and the retort is "This Message is hidden because Ben Kenobi is too stupid to interact with"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do people really think that political parties deeds centuries ago matter?
Collapse
X
-
You seem to hold the South in contempt for the Civil War, so, yeah.Also, relevancy in 2013?Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Republicans voted against the first African-American President in US history; I think this should be remembered for 500 years
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Democrats also voted against Abraham Lincoln and opposed the Emancipation Proclamation. 100 years later they opposed the civil rights act.Republicans voted against the first African-American President in US history; I think this should be remembered for 500 years
And you're holding the litmus test for Republicans that they opposed a president who's ancestors owned slaves, and were never slaves themselves?Last edited by Ben Kenobi; October 22, 2013, 17:49.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
I thought you didn't like Lincoln and belittled the emancipation proclamation for not liberating enough slaves... or do you like him when it's convenient for you?Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostDemocrats also voted against Abraham Lincoln and opposed the Emancipation Proclamation. 100 years later they opposed the civil rights act.
And you're holding the litmus test for Republicans that they opposed a president who's ancestors owned slaves, and were never slaves themselves?
Comment
-
I thought you considered him the patron saint of America a paragon all that was right and good about America. I don't like Lincoln. I'm also not an American either. We emancipated slaves long before you did and we did so without fighting a war.I thought you didn't like Lincoln and belittled the emancipation proclamation for not liberating enough slaves... or do you like him when it's convenient for you?
What does Lincoln mean to me when we had Wilberforce long before?Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
It would have been pretty awesome if the southern states hadn't seceded so as to prevent the possibility of peaceful emancipation. But, clearly, Republicans today must be evil tyrants if Lincoln was an evil tyrant 150 years ago.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostI thought you considered him the patron saint of America a paragon all that was right and good about America. I don't like Lincoln. I'm also not an American either. We emancipated slaves long before you did and we did so without fighting a war.
What does Lincoln mean to me when we had Wilberforce long before?
Comment
-
I suggest examining how Wilberforce did it to learn how it should have been done. Lincoln was a disaster, and if you have to destroy half of what you were appointed to save, well, that doesn't say much about your governance.It would have been pretty awesome if the southern states hadn't seceded so as to prevent the possibility of peaceful emancipation. But, clearly, Republicans today must be evil tyrants if Lincoln was an evil tyrant 150 years ago.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
If your suggestion is to abolish slavery through an act of Congress- like Britain's slavery abolition act- that would have failed since the southern states would have seceded long before such an act would have sufficient support to pass. Of course the British empire was, well, an empire and if their colonies didn't like having their slaves freed there was **** all they could do about it.
Comment
-
So the bill fails. Wilberforce tried it for 30 years before he was able to get a parliamentary majority sufficient to pass the act. Plus it was compensated emancipation. Had Lincoln compensated slave owners it would likely have passed the South.If your suggestion is to abolish slavery through an act of Congress- like Britain's slavery abolition act- that would have failed since the southern states would have seceded long before such an act would have sufficient support to pass.
If it hadn't been done by Wilberforce, the impetus would not have appeared in the United States for the same. In the end - it was peacefully passed - in 1964. All the Civil War accomplished was delaying true freedom for black people by 100 years.Of course the British empire was, well, an empire and if their colonies didn't like having their slaves freed there was **** all they could do about it.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 could have never succeeded if the southern states had been allowed to secede. Sorry but the United States is different from the British Empire.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostSo the bill fails. Wilberforce tried it for 30 years before he was able to get a parliamentary majority sufficient to pass the act. Plus it was compensated emancipation. Had Lincoln compensated slave owners it would likely have passed the South.
If it hadn't been done by Wilberforce, the impetus would not have appeared in the United States for the same. In the end - it was peacefully passed - in 1964. All the Civil War accomplished was delaying true freedom for black people by 100 years.
Comment
-
I'm not sure that I agree with this, but it certainly lowered the standard of living for all in the South (with the obvious exception of the slaves living in deplorable conditions) for 100 years. Many parts of the South did not see the level of 1860 economic activity until nearly 1970. A devastating and totally avoidable war fought for one terrible reason and many good political ones.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostAll the Civil War accomplished was delaying true freedom for black people by 100 years."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
If the South had successfully seceded then slavery probably would not have lasted more than another 20 years and the following hundred years of racial hatred and animosity might have never been. Who knows? The really sad thing is that so many who had no slaves suffered so horribly under the advance of brutal and vengeful soldiers. Sometimes it is easy to see why the U.S. is so hated by so many....Originally posted by gribbler View PostThe Civil Rights Act of 1964 could have never succeeded if the southern states had been allowed to secede. Sorry but the United States is different from the British Empire."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
Comment