Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shutdown over. Republicans blinked.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
    I don't believe you. Provide real evidence that you were against it because you're exactly the type of tea bagging nutjob who supported this nonsense from the beginning.
    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

    Comment


    • No, you're absolutely making yet another false equivalency argument just like Aeson did. One is bad in a regular sense and the other is bad in the "I'm a terrorist who will kill everyone and blow everything up if you don't give me what I want" sense. You're, quite stupidly, trying to pretend they're both equaly bad and that makes you a drooling ****ing idiot.
      Last edited by Dinner; October 17, 2013, 15:56.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • Irrationality truly is the heart of religion.
        As opposed to evil? You're going soft, Oerdin.
        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
          I don't care if you don't like it. DD is a known tea bagger so he doesn't get to claim he didn't support mindless tea bagging stupidity. He must prove it or people will, correctly, conclude he is a lying ****stain who has always sucked tea bagger taint. His "defense" reminds me of Nazis who claimed they never like Hitler (after they lost WW2). He has to prove it or it's bull****.
          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
            I'm a terrorist who will kill everyone and blow everything up
            sig material
            To us, it is the BEAST.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
              I don't care if you don't like it. DD is a known tea bagger so he doesn't get to claim he didn't support mindless tea bagging stupidity. He must prove it or people will, correctly, conclude he is a lying ****stain who has always sucked tea bagger taint.
              Please stop being on my side. You are an embarrassment.
              "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
              "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

              Comment


              • DD has a long, long, LOOOOONG history of being a mindless tea bagger mouth piece. He doesn't get to pretend he disagreed (back before the tea baggers were made fools of) with the tea baggers before thet were proven to be complete asses. He has to man up or shut up. Link the creditibile evidence because literally everything shows he's a mindless drone who supported this nonsense to the end.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                  Please stop being on my side. You are an embarrassment.
                  Your posting quality have declined remarkably of late.
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                    DD has a long, long, LOOOOONG history of being a mindless tea bagger mouth piece. He doesn't get to pretend he disagreed (back before the tea baggers were made fools of) with the tea baggers before thet were proven to be complete asses. He has to man up or shut up. Link the creditibile evidence because literally everything shows he's a mindless drone who supported this nonsense to the end.
                    I'm sorry, how is the burden of proof on DD? You're the one making the (completely unfounded, not to mention utterly inane and childish) accusation here.


                    Here's a hint, Oerdin. If you want to be taken seriously, stop using phrases like "tea bagger".
                    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                    Comment


                    • Go to the mandatory vacation thread. You'll find it there. Don't ask us to look it up for you because you are the only one who believes this nonsense.
                      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                      "Capitalism ho!"

                      Comment


                      • The burden of proof is on DD because he's the one making the ****ing unbelievable claim; that he never supported the tea baggers in their shut down of the government. He does not get a free ****ing pass. He has to prove that claim or accept that every semi-sentient person understands he's a liar who is full of ****.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                          If you want to be taken seriously, stop using phrases like "tea bagger".
                          No, when the tea party people began calling themselves "tea baggers", not even knowing they were describing a gay sex act, then they get to own the term. End of story. You call yourself "tea bagger" then everyone mother ****ing other person gets to call you a tea bagger because you're just that ****ing stupid.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                            The burden of proof is on DD because he's the one making the ****ing unbelievable claim; that he never supported the tea baggers in their shut down of the government. He does not get a free ****ing pass. He has to prove that claim or accept that every semi-sentient person understands he's a liar who is full of ****.
                            DD doesn't have to prove a negative.

                            Seriously. Get off your lazy ass and find where he said he supported the shutdown. I've paged through off-topic archives before just to find DD self-pwnage.
                            To us, it is the BEAST.

                            Comment


                            • Take some tea and relax.
                              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                              "Capitalism ho!"

                              Comment


                              • I'll echo to say that SINCE THE BEGINNING, DD has been against the shutdown. DD has had the position to let the ACA stand or fall on its own merits (and, of course, he believes it would fall) and that the GOP was helping the Dems by trying to delay any portion of it.
                                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X