Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Only in Texas: Body cavity search of scantily clad women on the motorway

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    H Tower, I really don't believe anything a cop says without some sort of physical evidence to back it up. Did you see the video of the 4th of July DUI check point stop in Texas? The cops just get pissed off at a guy for insisting they obey the law and the constitution so they completely lie, fake a reaction from a drug dog (the handler verbally orders the dog to bark, it was caught on camera), and then ransack the guy's car all so they can "teach him a lesson". This is routine stuff out of cops; we see abuses like that over and over.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Dinner View Post
      H Tower, I really don't believe anything a cop says without some sort of physical evidence to back it up. Did you see the video of the 4th of July DUI check point stop in Texas? The cops just get pissed off at a guy for insisting they obey the law and the constitution so they completely lie, fake a reaction from a drug dog (the handler verbally orders the dog to bark, it was caught on camera), and then ransack the guy's car all so they can "teach him a lesson". This is routine stuff out of cops; we see abuses like that over and over.
      Sure that was Texas? DUI check points are illegal here.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
        Eh, I think it should be very hard to require a body cavity search. More than just 'smell marijuana' or find a blunt (unless that itself was sufficient for an arrest - in which case take them into custody and do whatever you normally do at the jail). That's a significant invasion of both privacy and body.
        I think you're right snoopy. I wasn't defending the officers actions, just pointing out that the women didn't get cavity searched for a speeding ticket, there was a reason(even if it had been made up by the officer on the scene).

        Comment


        • #19
          All the women had to say was NO to an unwarranted search.
          Pretty ignorant on her part for not knowing her constitutional rights.

          Comment


          • #20
            To be fair, particularly for people not familiar with police interactions it's a very difficult situation when police order you to do something, even if they're not really allowed to do so. Not only are (most of us) trained from birth to respect authority, but the policeman has all of the power in that interaction; it can be very difficult to remember all of your rights and to assert them. That's one of the reasons we have very, very lenient laws in terms of search and seizure; relatively minor mistakes can lead to the search being declared invalid and the evidence discarded.
            <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
            I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
              To be fair, particularly for people not familiar with police interactions it's a very difficult situation when police order you to do something, even if they're not really allowed to do so. Not only are (most of us) trained from birth to respect authority, but the policeman has all of the power in that interaction; it can be very difficult to remember all of your rights and to assert them. That's one of the reasons we have very, very lenient laws in terms of search and seizure; relatively minor mistakes can lead to the search being declared invalid and the evidence discarded.
              Ignorant to ones rights is no excuse. Same as the law.

              Comment


              • #22
                It's not difficult to educate oneself to our constitutional rights. If one is willing to make an effort.
                Bet she has learned to say " NO! " next time should it happen.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thread useless without pics
                  Why do you hate polytubbies?
                  Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                  "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                  2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    no surprise doc blames the victim
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Didn't this happen ages ago?

                      e:
                      Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                      Thread useless without pics

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Docfeelgood View Post
                        Ignorant to ones rights is no excuse.
                        So basically you don't get your rights unless you claim them at the time?
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          In a perfect world the answer to that would be no, but people are not perfect and you can better defend your rights if you actually know what they are and are willing to stand up for them.
                          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                            Didn't this happen ages ago?

                            e:
                            Memorial Day 2012, but since the Daily Mail receives news updates from the US via sailing ships, this is just making the paper now.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              laws apply even when you don't know them

                              so do rights

                              what kind of ****ing moron would think otherwise?
                              To us, it is the BEAST.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I didn't say they didn't. I just said if you know them, you can better defend yourself from those that want to abuse them.
                                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X