Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Texas Liberals pledge allegiance to Satan...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
    It seems to be that folks who are against banning abortion in the last trimester get all huffy about only a minuscule amount of abortions happen then. Well, then why object so strongly to banning someone that the majority of the public want (the majority have ALWAYS been for banning late term abortion) that doesn't affect much?
    Because if you can fool enough people to support banning IDX, you can fool enough people to ban the whole thing.

    I'm generally not real big in slippery slope arguments. But considering there is absolutely no need whatsoever to ban the procedure, we shouldn't.

    And everyone should be against unnecessary legislation.
    To us, it is the BEAST.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Sava View Post
      Because if you can fool enough people to support banning IDX, you can fool enough people to ban the whole thing.

      I'm generally not real big in slippery slope arguments. But considering there is absolutely no need whatsoever to ban the procedure, we shouldn't.

      And everyone should be against unnecessary legislation.
      slippery slope, really?!

      There is no reason for the procedure to be legal. Past viability, most people agree that the unborn is a human (including myself). It's pure murder at that point since the child can live outside the body.
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
        slippery slope, really?!

        There is no reason for the procedure to be legal. Past viability, most people agree that the unborn is a human (including myself). It's pure murder at that point since the child can live outside the body.
        Stick to being a bad lawyer... and not a bad OBGYN.

        IDX is used because alternative procedures involve dismembering the fetus in utero.

        So yeah... it's absolutely necessary. And literally thousands of women's lives have been saved as a result.

        so **** you dumbass

        Your sports opinions are enough to render all of your thoughts null and void. It's nice to see you validate this and demonstrate the need to not take the things you say seriously.
        To us, it is the BEAST.

        Comment


        • #79
          insulting you isn't as fun when I can't read your responses
          Really? I find it hilarious. I can say whatever I want about you.
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • #80
            it's absolutely necessary. And literally thousands of women's lives have been saved as a result.
            What woman's life was saved that couldn't be saved if the abortion were done earlier?
            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Sava View Post
              Stick to being a bad lawyer... and not a bad OBGYN.

              IDX is used because alternative procedures involve dismembering the fetus in utero.

              So yeah... it's absolutely necessary. And literally thousands of women's lives have been saved as a result.

              so **** you dumbass

              Your sports opinions are enough to render all of your thoughts null and void. It's nice to see you validate this and demonstrate the need to not take the things you say seriously.
              I'm sorry, since when did anyone (aside from Ben) on this forum advocate for not including an exception for the life of the mother?
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                I'm sorry, since when did anyone (aside from Ben) on this forum advocate for not including an exception for the life of the mother?
                You just did... post 78

                Remember this?
                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                There is no reason for the procedure to be legal
                And the only time the procedure is done is for the health of the mother.
                To us, it is the BEAST.

                Comment


                • #83
                  With the understood caveat that applies to all abortions - rape, health of mother.
                  “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                  - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                    With the understood caveat that applies to all abortions - rape, health of mother.
                    But incest is okay?

                    WOW

                    JUST

                    WOW
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      How about this caveat: when you have a vagina, you can decide for yourself whether you want to bring a baby to term

                      For all other situations, mind your own ****ing business.
                      To us, it is the BEAST.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Sava View Post
                        But incest is okay?

                        WOW

                        JUST

                        WOW
                        Game of Thrones has made it acceptable .

                        Also, who uses the incest exemption? Sisters who were raped that's who.
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          when did anyone (aside from Ben) on this forum advocate for not including an exception for the life of the mother?
                          Imran, when have I advocated not including an exception for the life of the mother? Ectopic pregnancies are an unfortunate reality that results in a case that the mother's life is truly in danger if her pregnancy were to proceed. At present there is nothing that can be done to save the life of the child.
                          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Sava View Post
                            How about this caveat: when you have a vagina, you can decide for yourself whether you want to bring a baby to term

                            For all other situations, mind your own ****ing business.
                            No deal.

                            If you live in a society, everyone in the society gets to decide when people can kill other people .
                            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                              Imran, when have I advocated not including an exception for the life of the mother?
                              I thought you followed Catholic teaching on this? If I'm mistaken, I apologize.
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                                No deal.

                                If you live in a society, everyone in the society gets to decide when people can kill other people .
                                Agree. And we have already decided when a person is a person. At birth.

                                (and some obscure situations where a pregnant woman who intends to bring a baby to term is hurt or killed along with the unborn child)
                                To us, it is the BEAST.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X