Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Zimmerman Trial
Collapse
X
-
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
-
Interesting, thanks.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
By the way, this part of it seems to be far more important than the stand your ground part...12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Was that in reply to me? What does it have to do with anything?Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Postx-wiggy'd
It's concealed. It has no bearing on how Trayvon may have seen things when this started."In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion
Comment
-
Was that the part where the medical examiner said..Originally posted by Wiglaf View PostWhat preponderance of evidence is there that this wasn't self defense? The back of his head was injured so severely the examiners said he was probably being pummeled...a prosecution witness identified Zimmerman on the bottom...
"The injuries are so minor, and to me, slamming implies great force."
..or was it when he testified that..
"the cuts on Zimmerman's head are consistent with "one impact" and that the injuries were not life-threatening"
Just curious.
http://www.businessinsider.com/valer...t=allverticals
Comment
-
No. And that's not just from me, that's according to 49 of the 50 states of the Union, including such cavalier pro-gun, pro-self defense states as New York, California, Hawaii, Illinois, and New Jersey.Originally posted by kentonio View PostSo we have to prove that the reason he gave for killing Martin didn't happen? If you're going to kill someone, shouldn't the onus be on you to prove you had good reason?
If there isn't enough evidence to demonstrate it wasn't self defense, yes.Originally posted by kentonio View PostHe killed someone. If you shoot your wife, can you just say 'She was choking me and I feared for my life' and just walk away scot free?
Comment
-
What does what Trayvon knew have to do with my statement? I was describing the situation from a third party perspective using information we have, not information either of them had. If you'd like you can mentally edit out the part you fixated on, the point would stand without it.Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostYou're the one who added "with a gun in his pocket", so evidently you thought it had something to do with something."In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion
Comment
-
Don't be ridiculous, you can't just shoot someone and then the prosecution have to prove you didn't have a good reason.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostNo. And that's not just from me, that's according to 49 of the 50 states of the Union, including such cavalier pro-gun, pro-self defense states as New York, California, Hawaii, Illinois, and New Jersey.
If that's true then your country is a ****ing joke.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostIf there isn't enough evidence to demonstrate it wasn't self defense, yes.
Comment
Comment