Originally posted by kentonio
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Starving the beast: the U.S. Military
Collapse
X
-
What I'm trying to tell you is that this is false. The fact that we spend more on healthcare doesn't mean that the poor are paying all that much--in fact, usually, the poor don't pay anything. Our healthcare system is inefficient. From that standpoint, it is worse. But "efficiency" is not a good standpoint, by that logic, the best healthcare system would just put the old people out to grass.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
-
One more thing--it is entirely reasonable to say that rich people have more access and better care than poor people, in fact, it's essentially a tautology if you understand the true meaning of the words "rich" and "poor".If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Dude, it is not false. I know numerous Americans who simply cannot afford to visit a doctor, and when they get sick they spend as much time worrying how they can afford to miss work/pay for treatments/pay for transport to get to medical facilities etc as they do actually getting better. Over here an unemployed person can get full treatment for any illness for free, no bills, no fear of getting fired etc etc. When it comes to healthcare its a different world.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhat I'm trying to tell you is that this is false. The fact that we spend more on healthcare doesn't mean that the poor are paying all that much--in fact, usually, the poor don't pay anything. Our healthcare system is inefficient. From that standpoint, it is worse. But "efficiency" is not a good standpoint, by that logic, the best healthcare system would just put the old people out to grass.
Spoken like a true rich person. Here you can pay for private care too, but we ensure that EVERYBODY has a decent rate of care. It's called humanity.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostOne more thing--it is entirely reasonable to say that rich people have more access and better care than poor people, in fact, it's essentially a tautology if you understand the true meaning of the words "rich" and "poor".
Comment
-
I should hope an unemployed person would have no fear of being fired. Fired from what? A cannon?Originally posted by kentonio View PostDude, it is not false. I know numerous Americans who simply cannot afford to visit a doctor, and when they get sick they spend as much time worrying how they can afford to miss work/pay for treatments/pay for transport to get to medical facilities etc as they do actually getting better. Over here an unemployed person can get full treatment for any illness for free, no bills, no fear of getting fired etc etc. When it comes to healthcare its a different world.
PS: They also don't have to worry about that here, because we actually have medicaid. It's hugely inefficient, and way too many people are eligible, but we have it.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
I understand that, as an aspiring soldier, you want someone experienced covering your rear in a tight spot. But most of us don't see our armed forces getting into that kind of sticky situation with any real frequency.Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostI'm giving one vote for Spartan America
Also, on a totally unrelated note, you is gay.
Comment
-
For richer people, sure. Here's a little snippet from a study comparing survival rates between the Us and Canada.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostWe have by far the highest rate of cancer survival in the world.
RESULTS: There were significant associations between SES (socioeconomic status) and survival for most cancer sites in both the U.S. and Ontario, but the magnitude of the association was usually larger in the U.S. In the poorest communities, there were significant survival advantages in favor of cancer patients in Ontario for many disease groups, including cancers of the lung, head and neck region, cervix, and uterus. However, in upper- and middle-income communities, there were significant survival advantages in favor of the U.S. for all cases combined and for several individual diseases, including cancers of the breast, colon and rectum, prostate, and bladder.
Comment
-
20,000 people a year are estimated to die from a lack of healthcare each year in the US. You have a serious problem, and if you want to ignore that then you're being willfully blind.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostDifference in life expectancy between the US and, say, Britain, is explained entirely by death by non-natural causes.
Comment
-
What percentage of Americans diagnosed with cancer are on Medicare and consequently are included in a universal health care system of sorts?Originally posted by regexcellent View PostWe have by far the highest rate of cancer survival in the world.
Difference in life expectancy between the US and, say, Britain, is explained entirely by death by non-natural causes.
Comment
-
His statement didn't need fixing MrFun. It was factual. It's strange how the Huffington Post didn't feel the need to share it with you, maybe they're more interested in promoting an agenda than providing you with all the information.
John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
That linked article does not compare cancer survival rate between upper class, middle class, and lower class.Originally posted by Felch View PostHis statement didn't need fixing MrFun. It was factual. It's strange how the Huffington Post didn't feel the need to share it with you, maybe they're more interested in promoting an agenda than providing you with all the information.
A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Drones are low cost, and becoming very common. Multiple nations have advanced aircraft. Nuclear subs aren't really necessary unless you're in the business of hunting someone else's nuclear subs - that's why we've gotten rid of most of ours from the cold war days. Aircraft carriers are the most expensive mobile targets in the world, but they're useful in the geopolitical big dick contest, which is why China wants to piss away money on one.Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostSince when do they have drones, stealth aircraft, nuclear subs, and air craft carriers?When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
Comment