Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

School Shooting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by MrFun View Post
    And the examples that NRA tools use to support their position, are actually cases where the attacker had already stopped or was already fleeing.
    Joel Myrick seems like a good example here as none of those conditions applied when he got involved in stopping the Pearl shooting.
    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

    Comment


    • I'm not really a fan of the "OK Corral" approach, but that is a bit of agenda based reportage. "The killer had already apparently stopped" is something figured out by investigators after the fact - not something apparent in real time. Relying on whether the killer has decided he's done yet is not an approach I'd prefer, thank you.

      Also, the two guys who tried to intervene and didn't have much luck - the first one was a dumbass, you don't confront a shooter like that, you take his ****ing head off, end of story. The other guy got himself killed, but there's no detail on the tactical situation or whether he accomplished anything. Personally, if I'm dealing with someone with body armor and a Kalashnikov, I'm going to stay in cover unless and until I have a decent opportunity to make a head shot, unless it's a family member at risk from the shooter. Even with body armor, that's an advertisement for .45 ACP pr .357 Sig. Any decent hit on the body armor will knock the shooter on his ass, and give you the opportunity for a lethal follow up shot if you're in a position to take it.

      There is one valid point that the OK Corral crowd misses - it's not just arming everyone, it's the people being armed needing to have the skill, tactical sense, training and nerves to perform effectively.
      When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

      Comment


      • I like how Mother Jones can be relied on to mock the heroic efforts of people like Brendan McKown and Mark Wilson.

        Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
        Joel Myrick seems like a good example here as none of those conditions applied when he got involved in stopping the Pearl shooting.
        Oh MJ says he doesn't count because he was a Reservist. And as we all know, Reservists are elite badasses who do nothing but train with firearms all day, every day.
        John Brown did nothing wrong.

        Comment


        • Click image for larger version

Name:	563662_10151271121194463_1927621388_n.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	24.1 KB
ID:	9094373

          To be fair, a giant egg would scare the hell out of me too...
          "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

          Comment


          • Also, I love how Mother Jones can say that no mass shooting has been stopped by armed civilians, and they support this by defining mass shootings as those with four or more dead victims.

            Which means that if a shooter kills two or three innocent people, is able and apparently motivated to kill more, but is stopped by an armed citizen, Mother Jones ignores it.
            John Brown did nothing wrong.

            Comment


            • No successful mass shooting has ever been foiled by armed citizens, by definition.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dannubis View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]173145[/ATTACH]

                To be fair, a giant egg would scare the hell out of me too...
                I don't recognize those guns. They look like video game models.

                As far as the Kinder Surprise, you're right, we don't allow people to sell candy with choking hazards inside. I don't agree with the law, but cowards always overreact to negligible threats.
                John Brown did nothing wrong.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Felch View Post
                  I like how Mother Jones can be relied on to mock the heroic efforts of people like Brendan McKown and Mark Wilson.



                  Oh MJ says he doesn't count because he was a Reservist. And as we all know, Reservists are elite badasses who do nothing but train with firearms all day, every day.
                  My recollection is that Army reservists and guardsmen who aren't infantry will qualify on their weapons maybe once a year, sometimes once every two years.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                    No successful mass shooting has ever been foiled by armed citizens, by definition.
                    I love how we're expected to trust the police after what happened at the Empire State Building this year.
                    John Brown did nothing wrong.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Felch View Post
                      Also, I love how Mother Jones can say that no mass shooting has been stopped by armed civilians, and they support this by defining mass shootings as those with four or more dead victims.

                      Which means that if a shooter kills two or three innocent people, is able and apparently motivated to kill more, but is stopped by an armed citizen, Mother Jones ignores it.
                      Unfortunately, that's not what happened according to the article you cited. The guy didn't engage the shooter, the shooter wandered off and shot himself. Also, the guy in question was trained (albeit minimally) as an armed security guard. Not quite an effective indictment of Mother Jones' cherrypicking about the NRA's cherrypicking.
                      When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dannubis View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]173145[/ATTACH]

                        To be fair, a giant egg would scare the hell out of me too...
                        Those are video game weapons...
                        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                        ){ :|:& };:

                        Comment


                        • Yes, Felch said that already. And just like yourself he manages to miss the point entirely
                          "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View Post
                            Unfortunately, that's not what happened according to the article you cited. The guy didn't engage the shooter, the shooter wandered off and shot himself. Also, the guy in question was trained (albeit minimally) as an armed security guard. Not quite an effective indictment of Mother Jones' cherrypicking about the NRA's cherrypicking.
                            I don't know why the gunmen stopped shooting, maybe he was deterred by seeing someone else with a gun, maybe he just got high and wandered off, but at the very least it's proof that armed civilians aren't trigger happy morons. And while it's not a perfect example, it happened about a week ago so I figured it was pertinent.
                            John Brown did nothing wrong.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dannubis View Post
                              Yes, Felch said that already. And just like yourself he manages to miss the point entirely
                              Is the point that video games are legal and choking hazards are not?
                              John Brown did nothing wrong.

                              Comment


                              • Step 1...

                                Research the percentage of guns in the USA that are classed as assault rifles.

                                Step 2...

                                Look at what percentage of homicides involving a firearm are committed using an assault rifle.

                                Step 3...

                                Draw a conclusion.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X