So would it be considered a personal union just like pre-1707 or would there be a governor general like in Canada?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pointless referendum on Scottish independance set for 2014
Collapse
X
-
I had to look up what Buckfast was and on the wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckfast_Tonic_Wine) the very first thing you see is "Photo of an empty bottle of Buckfast Tonic Wine in a park in Glasgow"!Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View PostAn independent Scotland would be swiftly bankrupted if England raised the prices on Buckfast, lard and heroin.
Ahh, bless them. The next photograph is even better:
Something tells me the article was written by an Englishman.A bottle of Buckfast in the street. Buckfast's perception as being involved with street drinking, public intoxication and anti-social behaviour has caused controversy in Scotland.
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
If the Scots really wanted independence, they'd extend the referendum to allow the English to vote.The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
I think you are talking about the Queen Mum (Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes-Lyon) who was called "Empress of India" as part of her official title until the day she died (in 2002) but this is because she was married to King George VI who was officially "Emperor of India". By some strange quark of fate royalty are allowed to continue using such titles even if the country in question is no longer officially part of their empire. It's like how former US Presidents still get called "Mr. President" even though they're no longer in office. It's an honorific.Originally posted by notyoueither View PostShort answer. The relationship with the Crown is a subtle and flexible one.
India is a republic that crowned Elizabeth as Empress.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Let's not forget that nearly every English king from 1340 to 1800 also had the title "King of France". The French begged to differ.The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
No, that's definitely the perception in Scotland, a lot of people in England wouldn't really know what it was.Originally posted by Dinner View PostSomething tells me the article was written by an Englishman.
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
James VI conquered England on behalf of Scotland
, on which the eventual union was based, so really it should be the English who would be seeking independance, and not the Scots.
It's all English deception and trickery, first hostility and ultimately assimilation of the monarch and then monarchy in their own name
.
Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinner View PostI think you are talking about the Queen Mum (Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes-Lyon) who was called "Empress of India" as part of her official title until the day she died (in 2002) but this is because she was married to King George VI who was officially "Emperor of India". By some strange quark of fate royalty are allowed to continue using such titles even if the country in question is no longer officially part of their empire. It's like how former US Presidents still get called "Mr. President" even though they're no longer in office. It's an honorific.
And that right there is why fact-checking yourself is a good idea.
I could of sworn I saw or read something about Elizabeth II during a trip to India.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
I imagine many SNP voters learned everything they know about Scottish history from watching the movie Braveheart.Originally posted by kentonio View PostWhy do they act like we conquered them or something?
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Considering how well the Scots did out of the empire- exchanging one wet cold midge ridden poverty stricken country for the delights of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and assorted other pink coloured bits on old maps, I think they can hardly complain. They also got to kill a lot of French in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, and heaps of fuzzy wuzzies, Muslims and assorted inhabitants of the Indian sub-continent and Africa, whilst eating foreign food.Originally posted by kentonio View PostWhy do they act like we conquered them or something?
Sounds like a typical night out in Sauchiehall Street.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
){ :|:& };:

Comment