Racial is the new post-racial, Obama clarifies

[Al B. Sure!]

He's not making a call for a violence. He's basically explaining why Gandhi or Martin Luther King's tactics would have failed for the Jews in Nazi Germany. That's not the topic at hand, but I think you can understand it if I put it in those terms.

Or something about Israelis being oppressed by Arabs would work too

[Zevico]

Kanye West 2016.

[Dinner]

Anyone who reads the Daily Caller is an idiot. It's worse than Glenn Beck's wing nuttery.

[Ben Kenobi]

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but rich people are all for nonviolence. Why wouldn’t they be? They’ve got what they want. They want to make sure folks don’t take their stuff. The philosophy of nonviolence only makes sense if the powerful can be made to recognize themselves in the powerless. It only makes sense if the powerless can be made to recognize themselves in the powerful.

WTF Obama? He needs to read up on his Dr. King, on non-violent direct action, and how it helps the weak.

[Ben Kenobi]

That's not the topic at hand, but I think you can understand it if I put it in those terms.

Didn't fail for Bonhoeffer, etc. Persecution of conscientious objectors is part of what prompted intervention against the Nazis.

[kentonio]

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but rich people are all for nonviolence. Why wouldn’t they be? They’ve got what they want. They want to make sure folks don’t take their stuff. The philosophy of nonviolence only makes sense if the powerful can be made to recognize themselves in the powerless. It only makes sense if the powerless can be made to recognize themselves in the powerful.

Exactly right.

[Felch]

Obama is absolutely right that poor people need guns to defend themselves from rich people. At least, that's what I took from his comments.

[kentonio]

That's understandable if you listened to his comments and then made up your own version of what he actually said.

He was saying quite simply that inequality in society only works if those at the bottom have a reasonable expectation that they can change their position in life. If a poor person can feel like they can work hard and elevate their position or their childrens position and potentially one day become a rich person, then they can tolerate their lot. Equally, the rich need to understand that the difference between them and those less well off is nothing more than their industry (and good fortune).

If the poor feel like the rich are a seperate privileged class or the rich start to act like they are a better class of people who don't have to concern themselves with 90% of society then you start getting into very dangerous territory. That's how revolutions start, and then the rich discover that all their money is no security against the masses.

[Zevico]

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329756/phony-chief-thomas-sowell

When President Barack Obama and others on the left are not busy admonishing the rest of us to be “civil” in our discussions of political issues, they are busy letting loose insults, accusations, and smears against those who dare to disagree with them.

Like so many people who have been beaten in a verbal encounter, and who can think of clever things to say the next day after it is all over, President Obama, after his clear loss in his debate with Mitt Romney, called Governor Romney a “phony.”

Innumerable facts, however, show that it is our commander-in-chief who is phony-in-chief. A classic example was his speech to a predominantly black audience at Hampton University on June 5, 2007. That date is important, as we shall see.

In his speech — delivered in a ghetto-style accent that Obama doesn’t use anywhere except when he is addressing a black audience — he charged the federal government with not showing the same concern for the people of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit as it had shown for the people of New York after the 9/11 attacks, or the people of Florida after Hurricane Andrew hit.

Departing from his prepared remarks, he mentioned the Stafford Act, which requires communities receiving federal disaster relief to contribute 10 percent as much as the federal government does.

Senator Obama, as he was then, pointed out that this requirement was waived in the case of New York and Florida because the people there were considered “part of the American family.” But the people in New Orleans — predominantly black — “they don’t care about as much,” according to Barack Obama.

If you want to know what community organizers do, this is it — rub people’s emotions raw to hype their resentments. And this was Barack Obama in his old community-organizer role, a role that should have warned those who thought that he was someone who would bring us together, when he was all too well practiced in the arts of polarizing us.

Why is the date of this speech important? Because less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80–14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.

Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Barack Obama cannot claim that he wasn’t present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn’t there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.

Unlike Jeremiah Wright’s church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 senators who voted against — repeat, against – the legislation which included the waiver.

When he gave that demagogic speech, in a feigned accent and style, it was world-class chutzpah and a rhetorical triumph. He truly deserves the title phony-in-chief.

If you know any true believers in Obama, show them the transcript of his June 5, 2007, speech at Hampton University (available from the Federal News Service) and then show them page S6823 of the Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, which lists how Senators voted on the waiver of the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans.

Some people in the media have tried to dismiss this and other revelations of Barack Obama’s real character that have belatedly come to light as “old news.” But the truth is one thing that never wears out. The Pythagorean Theorem is 2,000 years old, but it can still tell you the distance from home plate to second base (127 ft.) without measuring it. And what happened five years ago can tell a lot about Barack Obama’s character — or lack of character.

Obama’s true believers may not want to know the truth. But there are millions of other people who have simply projected their desires for a post-racial America onto Barack Obama. These are the ones who need to be confronted with the truth, before they repeat the mistake they made when they voted four years ago.

[kentonio]

If you want to know what community organizers do, this is it — rub people’s emotions raw to hype their resentments.

Oh, sweet irony..

[Zevico]

The then Senator from Illinois told a bald faced race hustling lie. No irony at all.

[Asher]

Does it bother you that you are a racist, Zev? Or is this normal in Australia?

[Kidlicious]

The then Senator from Illinois told a bald faced race hustling lie. No irony at all.

The irony, is of course, that the right has exploited people's fears of blacks for political gain quite a bit since Obama ran for his first term.

[Docfeelgood]

The irony, is of course, that the right has exploited people's fears of blacks for political gain quite a bit since Obama ran for his first term.

Why is it anything negative said about Obama is seen as racist to Obama supporters?

[Guynemer]

You, good sir, are not the person who should be posing that particular question.