Tweet
Originally posted by SlowwHand
View Post
-
If he had said anything about doing this to his doctor, his doctor would be legally obligated to notify both the police and the intended victim (the theater). That's the law. He could not even just notify the police or just notify the victim, the doctor is required to notify both. Failure to do so could result in the loss of his license, criminal liability and, of course, civil liability. This is one area where public interest trumps confidentiality. The other areas are child and elder abuse."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end! -
"I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!Comment
-
Uhmn, the chick actually made a shot at the head - wether she hit or not depends if the bad guy carries to the right or left
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View Post
That's exactly what I was expecting, it's awesome to see they've actually proven it out.
All of these concealed carry people are more of a danger than a benefit. Too many years of Counter-Strike and Call of Duty has them thinking they're heroes."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
They've proven it out for years. Even when people know it's coming, they still faulter and the chances of people actually recalling correct details is very slim. This is why eye-witness accounts are not the be-all to end all in evidence.
BTW, yes the chick did get off a poorly aimed shot, but that was after she had been pelted in the head. The shot most likely would have never been made.
Nice vid, but the 'shooters' obviously knew who the 'defender' was so they targeted them.Founder of The Glory of War, CHAMPIONS OF APOLYTON!!!
'92 & '96 Perot, '00 & '04 Bush, '08 & '12 Obama, '16 Clinton, '20 Biden, '24 HarrisComment
-
Yeah, it was a pure set up. In the first one, the "shooter" even held his fire when somebody ran in front of the "defender".No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.Comment
-
If that's your idea of a well constructed experiment, you're an idiot.Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View PostJohn Brown did nothing wrong.Comment
-
Of course the completely unscientific "experiment" is from ABC News, the losers who desperately tried to link the Aurora shooting to the tea party. What a failed network, and the number of dislikes on that video shows America is tired of the fraud they perpetuate every day.Comment
-
Originally posted by Felch View Post
You are actually right. The subjects was of course on some kind of alert due to the training etc., so it would have been better to wait a month or two and make the experiment at a knitting course. That way we would have seen the real reactions of those subjects 
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
I just went to a gun show in Centreville. There were literally hundreds of the same type of weapon this guy used (AR-15). There was enough of an arsenal to start a small rebellion. Awesome stuff. I didn't buy anything, though.
They really hate obama there. Gun owners have the best ****ing kitschy t shirts and bumper stickers, it's awesome.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
If that old man can do it, in a real situation without ABC obviously trying to manipulate the results and color the viewer's reaction, anyone can.
Notice none of the fat idiots ABC dragged in for their stupidity never hurt anyone else with their concealed carry, either. They'd be dead anyway, since coincidentally the shooter zeroed in on them first every time and shot multiple times.Comment
-
That stupid old man was in no way a hero. He endangered numerous people in that room by shooting at a relatively peaceful robber in the back. He is the perfect proof of why untrained people shouldn't be allowed to carry weapon. In that case it ended well, but he could just as easily be responsible of several peoples unnessecary death.Originally posted by Wiglaf View PostWith or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
He seemed trained to me. And it's a good bet if more storeowners and patrons had guns, we'd have fewer robberies and violent crimes, as the founders intended
Comment
-
Your'e right. If more shopowners and customers carries guns, the number of robberies where the robbers more or less nicely asks people to remain calm and lay on the floor will drop. Instead the number of robberies where they go in with guns blasting away at whatever moves will grow - certainly saves lots of lives and moneyOriginally posted by Wiglaf View PostHe seemed trained to me. And it's a good bet if more storeowners and patrons had guns, we'd have fewer robberies and violent crimes, as the founders intended
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
Comment