Originally posted by Guynemer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Privately owned guns save more lives than they take
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostDepends on what kind of gun. If someone owns a .22 rifle, it's probably not as compensation."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostI meant .22LR, not 5.56 nato."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felch View PostWhen I said "them" I meant the people who thought they hit. Sorry if that wasn't clear."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by notyoueither View PostUhm, when is someone going to bring up deaths by gunshot in the US vs the civilised world?
Americans are ****ed up. But that's because of our culture; not because we have a lot of guns. We just don't know how to appreciate our freedoms."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostWhen is someone going to bring up the high gun ownership rates and low crime in Switzerland, Sweden, and Norway?
Americans are ****ed up. But that's because of our culture; not because we have a lot of guns. We just don't know how to appreciate our freedoms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View PostIf you read the study you'd find that most of the situations involving "DGU" were relatively close range, less than 50 feet. Firing at an adult form at that range a hit percentage of 40% isn't unexpected. OTOH the survey by Kleck was conducted at the end of the 1980's - beginning of the 1990's at a time when the total number of reported cases of "justifiable homicide" nationally was about 300 / year. It's ludicrous to suggest that 200,000 people fired upon "perps" at a less than 50 foot distance and only killed 300.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
In the year 2000 there were about 75,000 non-fatal gun woundings and 30,000 gunshot fatalities, so there is about a 30% chance that a person being shot will die. Also, most DGUs occurred at under 50 feet, 50 feet isn't the average, it's the limit."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment