It's not even about religion, really. If I believe A, B, and C, while you believe A, B, and not-C, at least one of us has to be at least partially wrong. The only case where this isn't true is if A, B, and C are all opinions along the lines of "chocolate ice cream is better than vanilla."
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
When is it okay to call someone a bigot or accuse them of hating?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Another question in regard to religious values and bigotry.
Why do we allow atheists to get married in the United States, when the religious right insists that marriage is a religious institution (just ignore marriage administered by justices of peace)?A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Seriously, if you're not going to even address my point, why respond to me?Originally posted by Elok View PostWha? He said nothing about moral inferiority one way or another. He just said they have an inferior understanding, which is pretty much necessary. If he thought Judaism was exactly as valid as his form of Christianity, that would leave him either believing two contradictory things or believing nothing at all. If there is a truth to be known, it stands to reason that some would be closer to it than others. Barring certain odd situations like each getting an equal number of aspects of the truth right, or some such. But the general idea of religion is knowing The Truth--not something that might be The Truth but then again so could Judaism so what the hey, but the actual Truth.
Supposing for the sake of argument that what Imran has is The Truth, then what Jews have is necessarily not The Truth insofar as it differs from what Imran has. If what Imran has is not The Truth, then he should get cracking and find what The Truth really is.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
OK, now I think you all may be thick.Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostReally I don't understand people who think that Christians/Muslims/Jews/Humanists/etc should consider everyone else's beliefs has equally valid.
It is completely nonsense.
Well said Elok.
JM“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Hypocricy isn't faith. It's doublemindedness. And no one thinks you hate Jews.Originally posted by MrFun View PostIt's not that I hate Jews - it's just that it's a matter of "faith" for me.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Why don't you try explaining how they are equal? Do you even know anything about those religions to say that they are equal?Originally posted by DaShi View PostOK, now I think you all may be thick.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Because that is not at all what I have been stating.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
What was your point? You appear to be claiming that we ought to accept all religious beliefs as equally valid or true in some sense; this, as I said, would make all theology utterly meaningless. It's not a matter of tolerance or bigotry, but of basic logic. If Christians are no more correct than Jews, why would anybody want to be a Christian? Is it just the fondness for pork?Originally posted by DaShi View PostSeriously, if you're not going to even address my point, why respond to me?
Comment
-
Where did I claim that we ought to accept all religious beliefs? Seriously, look for it, get on the same page, and then come back, because all I'm seeing from you is a bunch of unsubstantiated assumptions of what you think I am talking about. Maybe if you weren't so full of yourself, you'd be able to have a normal conversation with someone.Originally posted by Elok View PostWhat was your point? You appear to be claiming that we ought to accept all religious beliefs as equally valid or true in some sense; this, as I said, would make all theology utterly meaningless. It's not a matter of tolerance or bigotry, but of basic logic. If Christians are no more correct than Jews, why would anybody want to be a Christian? Is it just the fondness for pork?“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Honestly, I haven't been reading your posts.Originally posted by DaShi View PostBecause that is not at all what I have been stating.
I just thought Elok did a good job of explaining something which often needs explaining.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
Imran said Jews have a lesser understanding of God than Christians. This should not be shocking, given:
A. Imran believes religion is a matter of factual truth
B. Imran is a Christian
C. Christians and Jews believe different things
From A and B, we can conclude D that Imran thinks Christianity is correct, or at least comes nearest to the truth. From C and D we can conclude (from his POV) that Christianity has a better understanding of the truth than Judaism. There should be nothing controversial or offensive about this, and I should expect any Jew to hold a similar position regarding Christianity.
Comment
-
What did I just say about being too full of yourself?
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment

Comment