Originally posted by Elok
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do you hate Secular Humanism?
Collapse
X
-
The course I took on Buddhism covered Jainism since Jainism predated and influenced Buddhism. They're very similar, except that the Jains practice very severe austerities because they seek to eliminate all karma from their "souls" (scare quotes because they don't believe that humans have souls) in order to break the cycle of death and rebirth. Jain monks have a tendency to starve to death.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>
-
Because it's MY CHOICE. I didn't choose because of you.Originally posted by Elok View PostYou admitted in another thread that you're sticking around at least partially to spite my ostensible desire that you leave. I don't even have such a desire, and I certainly wasn't aiming for such an effect, but I had it anyway purely by accident. How are you independent?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
I am amazed that Elok hasn't given up on you yet - you are either the stupidest poster here or the most dishonest poster here (or both)Originally posted by Kidicious View PostI really don't think the OC is as screwed up as Elok is. He's got nothing better to do on a Sunday but argue forcefully in favor of non-christian beliefs.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>
Comment
-
Ah. I take it Jains influenced Buddhism in the sense that Buddhist moderation developed in reaction to such austerity?Originally posted by loinburger View PostThe course I took on Buddhism covered Jainism since Jainism predated and influenced Buddhism. They're very similar, except that the Jains practice very severe austerities because they seek to eliminate all karma from their "souls" (scare quotes because they don't believe that humans have souls) in order to break the cycle of death and rebirth. Jain monks have a tendency to starve to death.
Comment
-
But you made that choice because of my actions, no? If I had chosen differently, there's a chance that you would have chosen differently, at least in theory. There can be no total independence.Originally posted by Kidicious View PostBecause it's MY CHOICE. I didn't choose because of you.
You never know where an interesting conversation could come from. If Kid hadn't been "bugged" by Hindus and Buddhists, I wouldn't have gotten to think about how their traditions are similar to/different from mine. Nor learned that little tidbit about the diversity of Hindu conceptions of God.Originally posted by loinburger View PostI am amazed that Elok hasn't given up on you yet
Comment
-
Exactly. The story goes that the Buddha was a Jain at one point (prior to reaching enlightenment), but since neither opulence (from his time as a prince) nor austerity allowed him to achieve enlightenment, he formulated the "middle path" between the two.Originally posted by Elok View PostAh. I take it Jains influenced Buddhism in the sense that Buddhist moderation developed in reaction to such austerity?<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>
Comment
-
I think I actually recall reading something like that in Gonick's Cartoon History. It's been a while, though, and of course I didn't drag the books down with me.
Comment
-
Even ignoring me is a kind of response to my actions. You can't be totally unaffected. More importantly, your conception of human beings as isolated individuals is at least as threatening to Christian ethics as any Buddhist notion of illusory self. Probably more so, as Christ requires us to empty ourselves. The part where we receive ourselves back transfigured is unBuddhist--but perceiving the Christian life as something short of a communion between God and fellow-believers won't let you get even that far.Originally posted by Kidicious View PostWrong. I can choose to act as though you never said a thing. I can choose to believe that you never existed.
Comment
-
Truth. I was just reading about the Dyophysite Church of the East (the Nestorian Church which was too "separate natures of Christ" for the Chalcedonian mainstream) which was very big in Persia, Central Asia, and even China until Islam exploded out of the Middle East. Until Islam arose, the center of Christianity was Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria.Originally posted by Elok View Post2. All three of the Abrahamic religions developed in the Middle East. What we call Western thought is a batch of Greek notions fed through a Roman lens and reinterpreted by a bunch of Romanized Germanics over the course of a couple of thousand years. As an Orthodox Christian, I am keenly aware of how Western ideas have actually modified the Christian perspective over the years. Some of these changes are, to my way of thinking, harmless. Others, such as Anselm of Canterbury's legalistic ideas on the Atonement, are not.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
This is what you do. You define dependency as my knowledge of your existence. No one speaks like that except for you, in this context, because you argue with everything I say. Your argument is neither consistent with christianity OR buddhism. Just because I believe that you exist (and I'm choosing to do so) doesn't mean our consciousness is connected, not in the way buddhists believe.Originally posted by Elok View PostEven ignoring me is a kind of response to my actions. You can't be totally unaffected. More importantly, your conception of human beings as isolated individuals is at least as threatening to Christian ethics as any Buddhist notion of illusory self. Probably more so, as Christ requires us to empty ourselves. The part where we receive ourselves back transfigured is unBuddhist--but perceiving the Christian life as something short of a communion between God and fellow-believers won't let you get even that far.
And I'm starting to realize that you don't know anything about christianity. The vaste majority of christians, both contemporary and today and historically, believe as I do, in individual beings, that YES, exist. And they are free to make choices for themselves, regardless of what anyother human beings think. And it's not sin, but righteousness, because you wish to affect me so that I sin.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
Comment