Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Presidential candidate endorses terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    BS. Executions, warfare (ex Wellington butchering enemy soldiers) and killings are good examples of of terrorism. It's you that has a too narrow definition of the word.
    ******.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
      ******.
      BlackCat
      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

      Steven Weinberg

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
        Depends - if it was the result of a conspiracy, it could be called terrorism, but that would demand that the conspirators said it was them that did it. Since they haven't it was probably just a nutcase.
        This is asisine. Anyone who kills has an agenda, unless it is an accident.
        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
        "Capitalism ho!"

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
          BlackCat
          Yes, your name is becoming synonymous with ******.
          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
          "Capitalism ho!"

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
            No, I've been quite specific in what acts constitute terrorism and what don't. The fact that you can't read doesn't change this.
            Sure, you have been specific about what you think is terrorism, but that really doesn't matter if other people have an alternative interpretation and you are a minority.
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • And for all the people claiming to want a serious intellectual discussion who gripe about my definition of terrorism, have you asked me what I'm defining terrorism as? If the answer is no, then that's why you stupid.
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                Sure, you have been specific about what you think is terrorism, but that really doesn't matter if other people have an alternative interpretation and you are a minority.
                That didn't stop me from pointing out the logical flaws in your definition.
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                  Yes, your name is becoming synonymous with ******.
                  you are really that dense ?
                  With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                  Steven Weinberg

                  Comment


                  • I feel sorry for you.
                    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                    "Capitalism ho!"

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                      That didn't stop me from pointing out the logical flaws in your definition.
                      Well, if you really have done that, you can probably also tell me in wich post you did that.
                      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                      Steven Weinberg

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                        Yes, your name is becoming synonymous with ******.
                        Sorry, thoght that you wanted to tell me what your surname was.
                        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                        Steven Weinberg

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                          Sorry, thoght that you wanted to tell me what your surname was.
                          It wasn't clever to begin with. If you're really so insecure about it, make a separate thread explain how great you think all your insults are. I'm sure that it will be well received.
                          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                          "Capitalism ho!"

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                            Well, if you really have done that, you can probably also tell me in wich post you did that.
                            :sigh: This would be so much easier if you could read.
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by OneFootInTheGrave View Post


                              basically it's OK for Iranians/all other enemies of US to kill US engineers, politicians, etc... what's fair is fair...
                              Can we really say what is "OK" here? Certainly, as TMM says, "They can try." But, of course, there are consequences to them trying, just as the US would face consequences if they perform assassinations in Iran. The problem with terrorism is that it implies a moral stance (this is how the word is used toady). The receiver is not just a victim, but a horribly wronged victim, i.e. innocent bystanders. Now one might think that by applying terrorism to all forms of combat they are protecting all victims, but quite the contrary. Great pains have been taken to distinguish between enemy combatants and civilians, between valid and invalid targets all in an attempt to bring some sort of order to international conflict. But when we start blurring the line between them, then, no matter how horrible the act, civilians and other invalid targets now become just as valid as an armed hostile soldier.
                              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                              "Capitalism ho!"

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                                :sigh: This would be so much easier if you could read.
                                Yeah, and way much easier if it was possible for you to point out such a post
                                With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                                Steven Weinberg

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X