Originally posted by Felch
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US Presidential candidate endorses terrorism
Collapse
X
-
Killing people to prevent them to do their work and at the same time scare others to take up the task can easily be defined as terrorism.Originally posted by DaShi View PostNo, it's not. Like Kitchum, you're misunderstanding what terrorism is.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
We're not stupid enough to wait until they have nuclear weapons to react. We try to eliminate threats before they develop. Iran is a major international terrorism sponsor, they hate us, they hate our allies, and they want one of our closest allies to be utterly obliterated. We are justified in preventing them from becoming a threat. I see no problem with pre-emption.Originally posted by onodera View PostThey will not be a threat to the US, anyway. Disruption of a foreign policy doesn't justify murder.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Again, that definition is too broad. It applies to executions, warfare, and pretty much any killings. Just admit that you misused the word and move on.Originally posted by BlackCat View PostKilling people to prevent them to do their work and at the same time scare others to take up the task can easily be defined as terrorism.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
True dat, and columbian drug barons can also attack police academies, FBI training centers etc. since they are future threats. That is of course quite justifiableOriginally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWe're not stupid enough to wait until they have nuclear weapons to react. We try to eliminate threats before they develop. Iran is a major international terrorism sponsor, they hate us, they hate our allies, and they want one of our closest allies to be utterly obliterated. We are justified in preventing them from becoming a threat. I see no problem with pre-emption.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Yeah, they're one of our closest allies, or have you not been paying attention to the last 60 years of American foreign policy?Originally posted by gribbler View PostIsrael is now "one of our closest allies"? If that's the case our leaders are retarded.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
-
Cost of killing Iranian scientists: the rest of the world hates us more, and they will probably want to retaliate by sponsoring terrorism against usOriginally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostYeah, I think we're doing a cost benefit analysis there, grib.
Benefit: Their nuclear power program is slowed down slightly, so it takes them longer to build nuclear plants, and there's a possibility it could slow down their development of weapons they wouldn't have the balls to use anyway.
Yeah, Gingrich really is a smart guy!
Comment
-
BS. Executions, warfare (ex Wellington butchering enemy soldiers) and killings are good examples of of terrorism. It's you that has a too narrow definition of the word.Originally posted by DaShi View PostAgain, that definition is too broad. It applies to executions, warfare, and pretty much any killings. Just admit that you misused the word and move on.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Quite true - killing people to prevent them to do their work and intimidate others to stay awayOriginally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostBlackCat, it doesn't matter whether they could technically qualify as terrorism, we're using terrorism as a technical term here to mean something very specific.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Terrorism covers both instilling general fear in a society and in special groups.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
Comment