Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Presidential candidate endorses terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Felch View Post
    Yeah, that's the whole point of the law of the jungle. International law is bunk.
    QFT
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by DaShi View Post
      No, it's not. Like Kitchum, you're misunderstanding what terrorism is.
      Killing people to prevent them to do their work and at the same time scare others to take up the task can easily be defined as terrorism.
      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

      Steven Weinberg

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by onodera View Post
        They will not be a threat to the US, anyway. Disruption of a foreign policy doesn't justify murder.
        We're not stupid enough to wait until they have nuclear weapons to react. We try to eliminate threats before they develop. Iran is a major international terrorism sponsor, they hate us, they hate our allies, and they want one of our closest allies to be utterly obliterated. We are justified in preventing them from becoming a threat. I see no problem with pre-emption.
        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
        ){ :|:& };:

        Comment


        • #94
          Israel is now "one of our closest allies"? If that's the case our leaders are retarded.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
            Killing people to prevent them to do their work and at the same time scare others to take up the task can easily be defined as terrorism.
            Again, that definition is too broad. It applies to executions, warfare, and pretty much any killings. Just admit that you misused the word and move on.
            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
            "Capitalism ho!"

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
              We're not stupid enough to wait until they have nuclear weapons to react. We try to eliminate threats before they develop. Iran is a major international terrorism sponsor, they hate us, they hate our allies, and they want one of our closest allies to be utterly obliterated. We are justified in preventing them from becoming a threat. I see no problem with pre-emption.
              True dat, and columbian drug barons can also attack police academies, FBI training centers etc. since they are future threats. That is of course quite justifiable
              With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

              Steven Weinberg

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by gribbler View Post
                Israel is now "one of our closest allies"? If that's the case our leaders are retarded.
                Yeah, they're one of our closest allies, or have you not been paying attention to the last 60 years of American foreign policy?
                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                ){ :|:& };:

                Comment


                • #98
                  China might invade Taiwan in the future, so it's time to start killing Chinese people.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Yeah, I think we're doing a cost benefit analysis there, grib.
                    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                    ){ :|:& };:

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                      Yeah, they're one of our closest allies, or have you not been paying attention to the last 60 years of American foreign policy?
                      Your post is so vague that it actually doesn't provide any support for your initial assertion.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                        Yeah, I think we're doing a cost benefit analysis there, grib.
                        Cost of killing Iranian scientists: the rest of the world hates us more, and they will probably want to retaliate by sponsoring terrorism against us
                        Benefit: Their nuclear power program is slowed down slightly, so it takes them longer to build nuclear plants, and there's a possibility it could slow down their development of weapons they wouldn't have the balls to use anyway.

                        Yeah, Gingrich really is a smart guy!

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                          Again, that definition is too broad. It applies to executions, warfare, and pretty much any killings. Just admit that you misused the word and move on.
                          BS. Executions, warfare (ex Wellington butchering enemy soldiers) and killings are good examples of of terrorism. It's you that has a too narrow definition of the word.
                          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                          Steven Weinberg

                          Comment


                          • BlackCat, it doesn't matter whether they could technically qualify as terrorism, we're using terrorism as a technical term here to mean something very specific.
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                              BlackCat, it doesn't matter whether they could technically qualify as terrorism, we're using terrorism as a technical term here to mean something very specific.
                              Quite true - killing people to prevent them to do their work and intimidate others to stay away
                              With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                              Steven Weinberg

                              Comment


                              • Terrorism covers both instilling general fear in a society and in special groups.
                                With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                                Steven Weinberg

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X