Herman Cain On "Meet The Press": Liberals Are "Destroying" Economy

[Dinner]

Is there a minimum stupidity requirement in order for someone to handle your genitalia? Are you ripping on your girlfriend?

Indeed, you can lick my balls too.

[Dinner]

I don't think Herman Cain is stupid at all, actually.

But that is because you are ****ing stupid.

[MRT144]

Exactly. It was your parent's choice to keep you on their health insurance and to pay for you. Maybe you should ask them to stop if you don't like that provision of the law that much?

Why would HC be against the economic freedom his parents have while simultaneously advocating a position where those with limited economic freedom suffer?

[giblets]

Indeed, you can lick my balls too.

I don't qualify.

[Hauldren Collider]

But that is because you are ****ing stupid.

Your nicotine withdrawal is really showing, man. Although it's better than dying of lung cancer.

[Dinner]

Exactly. It was your parent's choice to keep you on their health insurance and to pay for you. Maybe you should ask them to stop if you don't like that provision of the law that much?

You have to remember that, for Republicans, individual responsibility is for other people, not persons with large amounts of cash.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Why would HC be against the economic freedom his parents have while simultaneously advocating a position where those with limited economic freedom suffer?

Because he's HC and has been known to have mindbogglingly stupid opinions.

[Dinner]

Your nicotine withdrawal is really showing, man. Although it's better than dying of lung cancer.

And you can lick my mother ****ing balls. Do you hear me? Balls!

[MRT144]

Because he's HC and has been known to have mindbogglingly stupid opinions.

They're completely consistent Imran; Those with dollars should do whatever they feel for their progeny, those without should just let their kids suffer.

BTW, loving the facebook posts lately. They're pure gold.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Nevermind - I see what you are saying now!

[Berzerker]

Why did we need a law allowing parents to keep up the family's health insurance? Why would insurance companies risk angering parents by kicking their kids off the plan?

Makes no sense, young adults aint exactly in a group insurance companies shy away from...

[MRT144]

Why did we need a law allowing parents to keep up the family's health insurance? Why would insurance companies risk angering parents by kicking their kids off the plan?

Makes no sense, young adults aint exactly in a group insurance companies shy away from...

I'm pretty sure parents would be turning down their work subsidized insurance by the droves if their kids couldn't be on it until they were 24.

[-Jrabbit]

Previously, insurance companies were not required to insure children over the age of 22 on the family insurance coverage -- so they didn't. (Re the "risk" of angering parents: not a problem, since it was standard practice by every insurance company in the U.S.) Not only did this create discontinuity in coverage for those with chronic conditions, it would in turn make them essentially uninsurable because, once they were off their parents' policy, they would have a "pre-existing" condition. Stupid and unfair. The Affordable Care Act addressed this. At least until the age of 26.

[MRT144]

Previously, insurance companies were not required to insure children over the age of 22 on the family insurance coverage -- so they didn't. (Re the "risk" of angering parents: not a problem, since it was standard practice by every insurance company in the U.S.) Not only did this create discontinuity in coverage for those with chronic conditions, it would in turn make them essentially uninsurable because, once they were off their parents' policy, they would have a "pre-existing" condition. Stupid and unfair. The Affordable Care Act addressed this. At least until the age of 26.

We should just make it 86. Just in case.

[Asher]

On the OP -- why is it that liberals destroy the economy when Canada's economy continues to hum along?

Seems to me it's not the liberals destroying the economy. In fact, it's well established that Canada weathered the economic conditions much better than most other countries precisely because of the more "liberal" policies in regulating the marketplace, among other things.