Originally posted by BlackCat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Guynemer, you're right - America is FVCKED up.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostHonestly, BC, it seems to me that he did mean what I thought he meant. It's still bad, because he's completely ignoring the point of what MrFun said (i.e., that saying "we were there first" is pointless, since we in turn were preceded by others, preceded by others) to turn the conversation back to Islam so his point sounds somewhat less unreasonable. His rhetorical question was phrased so ambiguously that I was actually kind of surprised to guess it right, but it WAS the least nonsensical interpretation.
Also, somebody's going to grump at you for quoting him.
Yeah, I know, I deserve to be punished for quoting his stupidityWith or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
It was rhetorical in that he already knew the answer and was merely asking to make a point. It so happens that the point was to draw attention away from the actual point, but the question does qualify as rhetorical, at least according to most people's definition.
Comment
-
I could accept it as such if he hadn't had MrFun's quote - that destroyed the rhetorical in his question and made it quite explicit. Besides that, his question is simply idiotic even if you try to fit it into context.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
The point was to yank Mr. Fun's chain. Did the job. That it baited Blackcat too is icing on the cake.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!
Comment
-
Oh, that's awesome. Look at this, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question :
"Is the Pope Catholic?" redirects here. For the minority view that the Pope is not Catholic, see Sedevacantism.
Anyway, I just looked it up to see if there's some other, "official" definition of an RQ. There isn't; "A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply." So what BK says does qualify. It's just a kind of silly rhetorical question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostOh, that's awesome. Look at this, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question :
"Is the Pope Catholic?" redirects here. For the minority view that the Pope is not Catholic, see Sedevacantism.
Anyway, I just looked it up to see if there's some other, "official" definition of an RQ. There isn't; "A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply." So what BK says does qualify. It's just a kind of silly rhetorical question.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Said in another way, rhethorical questions are only relevant if they have a relevance to the current subject/discussion. If not, you could ask if 16 yo heterosexual males gets sexually aroused by looking at naked women in any discussion. BK's question is on that level if it's asked as a rhetorical.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
As I said, it's not a particularly good one. But it meets minimal standards.
Comment
-
Are you really saying that it's a valid point to throw a "rhethorical" question out of subject into a discussion ?
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostWhat? Messianic Jews. I really don't see the difference between Joseph Smith and Muhammed."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barnabas View PostJoseph Smith is closer to the Bahai faith than to Christianity because he created new scripture and declared himself a new prophet.
I agree with Ben in this, I don't think Mormons are Christians."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment