Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guynemer, you're right - America is FVCKED up.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    Not me being in that. Question was what was be before christianity in the east roman empire and you claimed it was islam. The simple idiocy of drawing islam into that question before it's invented is just stupid. Rhetorical or not.
    Could you stop quoting him?

    Comment


    • #77
      Called it!
      1011 1100
      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Elok View Post
        Honestly, BC, it seems to me that he did mean what I thought he meant. It's still bad, because he's completely ignoring the point of what MrFun said (i.e., that saying "we were there first" is pointless, since we in turn were preceded by others, preceded by others) to turn the conversation back to Islam so his point sounds somewhat less unreasonable. His rhetorical question was phrased so ambiguously that I was actually kind of surprised to guess it right, but it WAS the least nonsensical interpretation.

        Also, somebody's going to grump at you for quoting him.
        While he in his twisted mind may have thought so, doesn't really mean that he should not be bashed for what he litterally claimed. I can in no way find his comment nearly rhethorical, just simply stupid. He might be on some special mushrooms or other kind of psychedelical substances, but he still needs to be bashed for them.

        Yeah, I know, I deserve to be punished for quoting his stupidity
        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

        Steven Weinberg

        Comment


        • #79
          It was rhetorical in that he already knew the answer and was merely asking to make a point. It so happens that the point was to draw attention away from the actual point, but the question does qualify as rhetorical, at least according to most people's definition.
          1011 1100
          Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

          Comment


          • #80
            I could accept it as such if he hadn't had MrFun's quote - that destroyed the rhetorical in his question and made it quite explicit. Besides that, his question is simply idiotic even if you try to fit it into context.
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • #81
              The point was to yank Mr. Fun's chain. Did the job. That it baited Blackcat too is icing on the cake.
              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

              Comment


              • #82
                Joseph Smith is closer to the Bahai faith than to Christianity because he created new scripture and declared himself a new prophet.
                I agree with Ben in this, I don't think Mormons are Christians.
                I need a foot massage

                Comment


                • #83
                  Oh, that's awesome. Look at this, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question :

                  "Is the Pope Catholic?" redirects here. For the minority view that the Pope is not Catholic, see Sedevacantism.

                  Anyway, I just looked it up to see if there's some other, "official" definition of an RQ. There isn't; "A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply." So what BK says does qualify. It's just a kind of silly rhetorical question.
                  1011 1100
                  Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Elok View Post
                    Oh, that's awesome. Look at this, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question :

                    "Is the Pope Catholic?" redirects here. For the minority view that the Pope is not Catholic, see Sedevacantism.

                    Anyway, I just looked it up to see if there's some other, "official" definition of an RQ. There isn't; "A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply." So what BK says does qualify. It's just a kind of silly rhetorical question.
                    Nah, BK fails because he ask the question as a reply to a specific statement where his question isn't relevant.
                    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                    Steven Weinberg

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Wikipedia isn't a valid reference

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Said in another way, rhethorical questions are only relevant if they have a relevance to the current subject/discussion. If not, you could ask if 16 yo heterosexual males gets sexually aroused by looking at naked women in any discussion. BK's question is on that level if it's asked as a rhetorical.
                        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                        Steven Weinberg

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          As I said, it's not a particularly good one. But it meets minimal standards.
                          1011 1100
                          Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Are you really saying that it's a valid point to throw a "rhethorical" question out of subject into a discussion ?
                            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                            Steven Weinberg

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                              What? Messianic Jews. I really don't see the difference between Joseph Smith and Muhammed.
                              Well you're going to have one heck of a time of Milt Romney wins in 2012. Obama has been rather lenient with those woh called him a muslim, but if Romeny wins and you call him a muslim? Oh man, you might be moving to Gitmo.
                              "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Barnabas View Post
                                Joseph Smith is closer to the Bahai faith than to Christianity because he created new scripture and declared himself a new prophet.
                                I agree with Ben in this, I don't think Mormons are Christians.
                                Mormons just go to show that in the US of A anything is possible.
                                "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X