Why do 90% of black people vote for Democrats?

[MikeH]

I haven't read everything molly has written in this thread, but what I have read seems accurate.

[Flubber]

I wonder if HC is familiar with Yaffa in 1948:



Truck bombs... mortar bombardments... The Palestinians learned terrorism from the best, apparently.

Ya -- those post- Holocaust jews-- just a few scant months before nationhood and a war on the same day with Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Lebanon, Iraq and really also Saudia Arabia- what bullies

Israel has made many mistakes but I believe one must gauge their actions in the light that in 1948 they were still of a mindset that they were fighting for their very survival. Can anyone deny this? heck if Czeckoslovakia had not supplied arms, the state of Israel may have ceased to exist in its first year.

I don't know how this particular set of actions were viewed by the mainstream leadership but I am aware that the Irgun were the more radical of the Israeli factions and many of their actions were not supported .

[Flubber]

If in doubt, rely on invective. You've already accused me on no evidence at all of ignoring or treating Protestant terrorism differently from Catholic terrorism. I distrust and dislike all religious fanatics..

Thats vintage Ben and something he has used repeatedly across topics and threads-- According to Ben, I only pointed out his blatant errors regarding family law and later the canadian constitution because I was anti-Catholic or against his politics-- he always assumes a huge bias and cannot accept that some people point out he is wrong , --- well because he is demonstrably and obviously WRONG and that such people would do the same analysis about posts by a gay socialist as they do for a religious conservative

Similarly my dislike for Roberto Luongo as a clutch goalie is, according to ben, rooted in my deep hatred for the Canucks and has nothing to do with the player's meltdowns in key situations over the last couple of years.

Bottom line is that Ben never accepts that people disagree with him beacuse he is wrong, factually , on something. Since he is always arguing based on super strong biases, he seems incapable of dealing with the posters that are more dispassionate and objective

[Flubber]

Oh and keep on trucking apolyton-- I read the first two pages of the thread-- responded to something on Israel and came to the end where I see that voting/gerrymandering is still a topic but somehow the history of England has become a thing-- I cannot be bothered to read it all but I love it that poly still has enough posters to have this happen sometime-- maybe when I pop back again in a week or so, I will check to see how this one turned out

[The Mad Monk]

Flubber

[Elok]

By the way, Molly and Flubber, I think you both missed the time, a couple of weeks back, when Dr. Strangelove caught BK arguing with himself. Literally. He accidentally quoted himself, and without noticing proceeded to attack his own arguments exactly the same way he attacks everyone else's.

[MikeH]

Link please

[Hauldren Collider]

Oh my god, that's amazing. For the love of god, please link.

[Elok]

This might be kind of anticlimactic; he only quoted one line. But here it is, near the end of this thread: http://apolyton.net/showthread.php/1...s-thread/page3

[kentonio]

That's beautiful.

[Ben Kenobi]

Flubber:

You ane an Oilers fan! By nature you will be biased against Roberto Luongo, just as I will be biased in favour of him. Arguing that you are neutral in a Luongo discussion makes no sense to me.

[Lorizael]

Beautiful.

[Ben Kenobi]

By the way, Molly and Flubber, I think you both missed the time, a couple of weeks back, when Dr. Strangelove caught BK arguing with himself. Literally. He accidentally quoted himself, and without noticing proceeded to attack his own arguments exactly the same way he attacks everyone else's.

Uh, it's one thing for me, as someone who *isn't* an American and quite another for someone who *is* to make that particular statement. Cut and paste posting makes it easy to mix up stuff.

[Ben Kenobi]

Thats vintage Ben and something he has used repeatedly across topics and threads-- According to Ben, I only pointed out his blatant errors regarding family law and later the canadian constitution because I was anti-Catholic or against his politics-- he always assumes a huge bias and cannot accept that some people point out he is wrong , --- well because he is demonstrably and obviously WRONG and that such people would do the same analysis about posts by a gay socialist as they do for a religious conservative

Any case that relies upon the assertion that Molly Bloom is a reliable poster isn't a good theory, Flubber. He's very biased, and yes the typical atheist is extremely biased against Catholicism.

[C0ckney]

why would an atheist be biased against catholicism as opposed to any other church. that's a ridiculous assertion.