Reagan on Mt. Rushmore?

[Imran Siddiqui]

Absolutely not to Rushmore. But if Kennedy and Grant (!!?) can get on a bill/coin, then Reagan can merit at least that much. I'd say take Grant off the $50 and put on the Gipper. Grant was a crappy president.

But he was a great general.

And yes, Reagan deserves to be on money far more than Kennedy does.

[Hauldren Collider]

This statement of yours encapsulates pretty much every reason who nobody pays attention to what you say. And why you are a tool.

Yeah. The soviet union was more of a threat to us that Al Qaeda ever was or could ever be.

[Ben Kenobi]

real historians recognize that fact

I have a history disagree and I disagree with you.

[giblets]

Real historians have PhD's

[Ben Kenobi]

Does Oerdin have a PHD in History? I'm sure the real historians don't need Oerdin as a mouthpiece.

[giblets]

He never claimed to be a historian. He simply made an observation about them.

[Ben Kenobi]

So if I were to say that real historians believe that Oerdin is full of ****, that would be me making an observation about them? Ok.

[giblets]

Real historians don't give a **** about Oerdin.

[Docfeelgood]

I have a history disagree and I disagree with you.

wow!

[Ben Kenobi]

Real historians don't give a **** about Oerdin.

Something we can agree upon.

[Hauldren Collider]

I thought Resident ****** was an astronomy major. I wish he would just stick to being bad at physics. That was so much funnier.

That said, at the assertion that "real historians" universally criticize Reagan.

[Ben Kenobi]

I thought Resident ****** was an astronomy major. I wish he would just stick to being bad at physics. That was so much funnier.

I was one. Honours physics and astronomy for two years before I switched over.

Never said I was great at it, especially here where you have PhD's like KH and Jon Miller who have earned their spurs.

But yes, I've got a history degree.

You might want to try reading up on folks before castigating them.

[Dinner]

This statement of yours encapsulates pretty much every reason who nobody pays attention to what you say. And why you are a tool.

Glad to have you back, Patty, but hopefully they didn't run you off from CFC for good and you can go back there soon.

The really funny thing is you can't counter any of the facts with a real argument and you just degenerate, as usual, to name calling. I think we all know exactly who here is unable to actually debate or back up their claims. Que Patty's usual "Nah Uh! I just don't feel like debating you because you're a (insert generic insult here)!"

[Dinner]

So if I were to say that real historians believe that Oerdin is full of ****, that would be me making an observation about them? Ok.

You may want to notice the link to the video in this thread were real historians ranked even the half term Obama above Reagan in accomplishments. Lonestar posted it, I commented on it, and, as usual, you got everything mixed up. Good job, Ben.

[Dinner]

It seems I'm not the only one who thinks the modern Republican Party has moved so far to the left they would kick Reagan out of the party if he was running for office now.