Tweet
Summary please. 
-
No summary possible - you are supposed to use your brain. I know that it's difficult for CAGW's, but make a try
EDIT: Note, it's not written by some worthless piece of crap payed by the carbon industry.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Well, it depends which CAGW you mean. One CAGW is pro, whereas the other one is anti...
Comment
-
Now, just read. It will give two good results - you get smarter, we get peace for a week or two
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
I heard HAARP might be responsible for all the storms Australia has been getting. So it might not be global warming.Comment
-
Only if you tell me which CAGW you mean...Originally posted by BlackCat View PostNow, just read. It will give two good results - you get smarter, we get peace for a week or two
Comment
-
Lazy sheepbanger, just start reading.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Ha ha, clearly by dodging that question, you realise that your attempt to be clever has backfired!
Comment
-
Problem is that I'm not sure what you are asking - you are definitely pro ACGW, so now you have an answer, please start reading
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Then you're not as clever as I thought...
If you were you'd know that the organisation with the CAGW acronym is a right-wing lobby front for climate change deniers!
Comment
-
BTW, belief in the other CAGW is neither here nor there when the precautionary principle exposes the basic stupidity of the climate change deniers' position.Comment
-
Never heard about those nutcases before, so I of course thought that you would recognise the correct understanding of it. Hansen, Gore etc. are principal purpetors of this and you clearly are the same ilk.
About the precautionary, well, did you read that link where, if we didn't do anything, then New York would now be sub sea ? (that's the Hansen link).
Being precautionary is rational, but if it's based on idiocy, then it's, well idiocy.
That is why I want you to read the link so you actually has an idea about what you are making inane claims about
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
1. pissing into the wind
Engaging in a pointless activity; something futile.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ BraindeadComment
-
Well, I can't resist to pry some innocent soul out of the dark, even if it's MOBIUS.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Mobby, stop acting as a Jonestown acolyte and take a dose of science - belive me, it wont hurt and you will feel much better.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
Comment