Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should there be a religious requirement to hold political office?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
    We already have an atheist in office, so I'd say that there isn't one.
    Yeah, that's probably true.

    He still has to publicly profess to be Christian though.
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • #17
      Our last president already made decisions based on what God told him to do and it was disaster.
      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
      "Capitalism ho!"

      Comment


      • #18
        Except it was really Dick Cheney whispering from the next room.
        Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

        When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

        Comment


        • #19
          I still remember back in the 60's where they were questioning if JFK could ever be elected since he was Catholic.
          We've come a long way.
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • #20
            And yet such a long road still lies ahead...
            "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
              Yeah, that's probably true.

              He still has to publicly profess to be Christian though.
              Hence, the reason why I created this thread. Everyone here knows that officially, the constitutional law forbids religious requirement for holding political office. But there are many voters who vote for a particular candidate for stupid reasons - such as what that person's religion is. I'm not saying this should be illegal, but again, we're talking about stupidity here.
              A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

              Comment


              • #22
                DOes Canada have a Constitution?
                Yes, and no. Yes, in that we had the British North America Act dating back to 1867, which is somewhat similar to the US constitution, but there are substantial differences. Then the 'repatriated' constitution in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which was brought home by Turdeau.

                So it's a bit different for Canadians. They don't have a 'founding document' although they have 'organising principles' for lack of a better word.
                Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by rah View Post
                  I still remember back in the 60's where they were questioning if JFK could ever be elected since he was Catholic.
                  We've come a long way.
                  Really? Name the second Roman Catholic President.
                  "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
                    Yes, and no. Yes, in that we had the British North America Act dating back to 1867, which is somewhat similar to the US constitution, but there are substantial differences. Then the 'repatriated' constitution in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which was brought home by Turdeau.

                    So it's a bit different for Canadians. They don't have a 'founding document' although they have 'organising principles' for lack of a better word.
                    Wasn't there some sort of basic charter document written and signed when Canada became a (more or less) united Dominion?
                    "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                      But there are many voters who vote for a particular candidate for stupid reasons - such as what that person's religion is.
                      You mean like democrats?

                      This troll has a deeper point to it, by the way.
                      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                      ){ :|:& };:

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I'm a Democrat and I don't vote for a candidate for a stupid reason like what that candidate's religion is.
                        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Wasn't there some sort of basic charter document written and signed when Canada became a (more or less) united Dominion?
                          That's the British North America Act.

                          The biggest differences from the US constitution is that Canada had no amending formula, amendments could only be passed in Westminster.
                          Last edited by Ben Kenobi; August 28, 2010, 13:16.
                          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                            I'm a Democrat and I don't vote for a candidate for a stupid reason like what that candidate's religion is.
                            What I meant is that religion is a completely valid part of a candidate's platform.
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Care to elaborate on that? Given the 1st Amendment, it only seems relevant if the religious beliefs are really out there, to the extent that they call the candidate's character into question. For example, if somebody who follows Fred Phelps somehow managed to get off the ground politically while screaming "God hates America" all the time, I'd wonder if perhaps he were a bit unhinged. Ditto for Scientologists, but I can't think of much else. I guess I'd have a hard time taking a Wiccan or Satanist seriously, but I could probably overlook even that for a sufficiently impressive candidate.
                              1011 1100
                              Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                There is a difference between no established religion plus freedom of religion and voting based on religion. While I personally think it is silly, it is valid to vote for somebody because their beliefs line up with yours--be it political beliefs, religious beliefs or both.
                                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                                ){ :|:& };:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X