Originally posted by KrazyHorse
View Post
Eh? Anytime I've heard the term used, it's simply a descriptive term. "So and so is a Dom" or "So and so is a Sub".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9666/a96667f3c9bdd120b0103f1114c87d1e4a8e2be1" alt="Dunno"
Most of the Doms I've met have been pretty freakin' hot. I really don't see how the term is an insult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9666/a96667f3c9bdd120b0103f1114c87d1e4a8e2be1" alt="Dunno"
It's somewhat akin to calling her a fursuiter or some other fetishist.
There is nothing inherently wrong with a bit of harmless BDSM play. Everyone has at least one fetish, be it leather, bondage, anal sex, Panda ****ing, or whatever. Just because it isn't your thing doesn't make it wrong.
Comment