I think the BBC is hype about the wrong thing... I'd be more concerned with the diminishing role of Thomas Jefferson, the biased attitude towards the UN, etc.
To be fair, I remember reading an article by Robert Bork in which he talked about high school history textbooks which were slanted to the liberal side, with the Constitutional Convention getting half a paragraph or something like that whereas the Seneca Falls convention got whole pages. While Judge Bork is obviously biased, his facts I'm sure were legitimate. There's likely been much similar white-washing of history but from a liberal perspective in many communities (especially when teachers do tend to be disproportionately liberal).
I suspect Philly public school textbooks were like this. We learned a lot about Mali, for example, and very little about Europe before 1600 or so.
To be fair, I remember reading an article by Robert Bork in which he talked about high school history textbooks which were slanted to the liberal side, with the Constitutional Convention getting half a paragraph or something like that whereas the Seneca Falls convention got whole pages. While Judge Bork is obviously biased, his facts I'm sure were legitimate. There's likely been much similar white-washing of history but from a liberal perspective in many communities (especially when teachers do tend to be disproportionately liberal).
I suspect Philly public school textbooks were like this. We learned a lot about Mali, for example, and very little about Europe before 1600 or so.
Comment