Originally posted by David Floyd
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
World War 2 What If
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostI'm not one of the resident history buffs here. I just figured that would be Hitler's next move in that situation, given what I know of his attitude towards practicality. Firepower disparities and such, I leave to you folks.
Comment
-
Albert Speer,
Actually, if the Nazis wanted to invade America, they would probably try to use Mexico or the Dominican Republic as staging points.
Also, as a Marine, aren't you aware of the history of the USMC in the Caribbean during that time period??
Blackcat,
Uhmn, yes. The transport ships were the primary target because they affected the land war in russia. If russia is out of the equation, it means that all german subs can concentrate on transports to england.
For a sub there isn't much difference between a military target and a civilian as long as it's undetected.
Elok,
I'm not one of the resident history buffs here. I just figured that would be Hitler's next move in that situation, given what I know of his attitude towards practicality. Firepower disparities and such, I leave to you folks.
Although, yes, the ACTUAL firepower disparity made it even more impossible, even if the German Z Plan for a naval build up was both tripled and completedFollow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostWhat do you know about his "attitude towards practicality"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Floyd View PostHere's a fun What If, for the military history fans in the room...
If Operation Barbarossa "somehow" succeeded in forcing the Soviets to sue for peace (and, let's just stipulate that this happens, don't focus on the "how"), is it possible for the Western Allies to win the war? Assume that in this scenario, the Soviets are knocked out sometime after December 1941, and that the US has entered the war on schedule.
The Red Army did the most of the fighting and played desicive role. Like it or not, but it is a simple fact.
Simple as that.
With France and Soviets lost - Germany dominates in entire Europe and UK and US can do about that even less than they could do about Soviets dominating the eastern half of the Europe.
We would have another cold war where Nazi were free to go to eliminate all "untermenshes" and build a new order with accordance with their Nazi bullsh!t theory.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by David Floyd View PostIsn't Germany able to devote far more forces to North Africa? For that matter, why can't Germany and Italy take down Malta in the summer of 1942? That would eliminate the main logistical problem in shipping supplies to North Africa. Combine that with the transfer of an entire Luftflotte to Sicily and an additional Panzerarmee to North Africa, and I'm not so sure it's a walk in the park campaign for the Allies.
Comment
-
UK and US can do about that even less than they could do about Soviets dominating the eastern half of the Europe.
The U.S. could've taken Eastern Europe back and occupied Russia, if they'd really felt like it. Luckily, no one listened to Patton when he suggested it and you pussies collapsed without a fight after a few decades.KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten View PostIn this scenario, Malta is gone
You've given no convincing reason why Germany, if Barbarossa had succeeded, would magically be able to take Malta in the face of British and American naval superiority. Taking Malta was hard, the Germans couldn't do it in real life, and defeating the Russians wouldn't have given the Germans any significant advantage in being able to do so.
Moreover, if Barbarossa had succeeded, Spain and Turkey would join the Axis for sure. That means the end of the British Empire (how the f*ck they would have supply their troops in the region, if Germany on pair with Spain takes Gibraltar?) and total domination of Nazis in Europe (at least in Europe). US would have another Cold war, but this time with way more stronger enemy, who has way more resources.
Comment
-
If Barbarossa had succeeded, Hitler would have all the aircrafts and paratroopers participated in Barbarossa to fight UK/US. Malta would have been lost for sure.
Good luck taking Malta with just paratroopers.
Moreover, if Barbarossa had succeeded, Spain and Turkey would join the Axis for sure.
Excellent. More coastline for the Germans to defend against an American landing.KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten View PostUK and US can do about that even less than they could do about Soviets dominating the eastern half of the Europe.
The U.S. could've taken Eastern Europe back and occupied Russia, if they'd really felt like it. Luckily, no one listened to Patton when he suggested it and you pussies collapsed without a fight after a few decades.
Comment
-
You had plans to nuke us to death and kill dozens of millions people, just because we had a different ideology.
We probably would've saved lives on the whole by nuking you and overthrowing your government, but it wasn't our responsibility to rescue the Russians from themselves. Letting the commies beat you down for 50 years while we waited to swoop in after the inevitable collapse was the much smarter course of action.KH FOR OWNER!
ASHER FOR CEO!!
GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Comment
Comment