Tea Party topples its first incumbent.

[DaShi]

Well, I didn't read that far back. But he actually changed his argument later. So I'm surprised your quoting his new argument while bringing up evidence against his old.

[Drake Tungsten]

But he actually changed his argument later.

No ****. He changed his argument to some nonsensical BS about how Scott Brown doesn't count (even though the Tea Party supported him) after he got pwned. And then you came in to try your luck without having read the thread. It's like shooting fish in a barrel...

[DaShi]

I was still right in my own mind. But I concede, it was foolish of me to try to salvage his argument after reading the whole debacle.

[Drake Tungsten]

Concession accepted. As punishment, you'll have to suck Guy's dick tonight in my stead. I've got a conflicting engagement.

[DaShi]

How is that a punishment?

[Drake Tungsten]

One word: smegma.

You'd figure a doctor would be more conscientious about his personal hygiene.

[Ben Kenobi]

Disagreeing with the welfare state pretty much does make you a loony.

Umm, why?

It's unsustainable.

[Dinner]

He's a Republican who would be considered a liberal to moderate Republican; he's exactly the type of Republican the tea baggers have been targeting for elimination. Just because a Republican wins doesn't mean a tea bagger wins.

From the first paragraph of the article Oerdin linked to...

Last January, Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) triumphed in his long-shot campaign for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts with the help of Tea Party activists. In addition to offering its support, the Tea Party Express PAC spent nearly $300,000 backing Brown or attacking his opponent Martha Coakley. “If it wasn’t for the Tea Party movement, Scott Brown wouldn’t have gotten that seat,” said one Tea Party activist.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/12/...a-party-palin/

"said one tea party activist"! Yep, that's clearly an unbiased source.

[Drake Tungsten]

"said one tea party activist"! Yep, that's clearly an unbiased source.

It's your source!!!

[Dinner]

I'm talking about the quote. Sure, a single tea bagger on the street said that but that doesn't make it reality. The reality is the tea baggers hate Scott Brown and call him both a RINO and a traitor so don't try to claim him as a tea bagger win.

[Drake Tungsten]

You already embarrassed yourself, dude. There's no need to continue on and make it worse.

[Dinner]

BUZZ! I said taking the word of one tea bagger making a claim was a dumb thing for you to do and you've tried to falsely spin things like you always do. Just man up and admit you failed again then try not to be so retarded next time.

[Drake Tungsten]

Do you really think you're going to be able to turn this around on me?

[Dinner]

Drake: "See the article you linked quoted a tea bagger making a completely unsupported claim!"

Oerdin: "Yeah, but that's just one tea bagger making a completely unsupported claim."

Drake: "I win!"

Everyone else: "Er... No."

You can continue to try to spin this but you'll only look dumber and more desperate.

[Drake Tungsten]

Again, the important bits of the paragraph are from ThinkProgress. The teabagger's quote is irrelevant.

Also, I totally won.