Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tea Party topples its first incumbent.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tea Party topples its first incumbent.

    Tea party wins victory in Utah as incumbent GOP senator loses bid for nomination

    RiNO's beware! Who needs term limits with the TP punting career politicians out of the Congress?

    The national "tea party" movement toppled its first incumbent Saturday as long-serving Sen. Robert F. Bennett was defeated at the Utah Republican Party's nominating convention, the most powerful demonstration yet of the anti-Washington tide that is altering the nation's political landscape.

    Bennett, seeking a fourth term after 18 years in office, became the first sitting senator to fall in the ideological battle being waged in his party. Although he has long been viewed as a reliable conservative with deep Mormon roots, Republicans rallied behind two other candidates -- neither of whom has held political office -- who will compete for the nomination at a June primary.

    National tea party organizers embraced the victory as a major first step toward returning the Republican Party to its conservative foundations of limited government and low taxes. At the Salt Palace Convention Center in Salt Lake City, tea party activists cheered and celebrated after Bennett lost.

    "This is a symbol that the tea party movement and the broader limited-government agenda is huge," said Brendan Steinhauser, grass-roots director for the national tea party organization FreedomWorks, which set up a booth at the convention to herald Bennett's defeat. "It's the center of American politics. It's everything that we've been saying it is. It's not just a protest movement; it's a political force."

    Steinhauser said Bennett's defeat represents a critical first win that will help build momentum in other contests across the nation. Next up is Kentucky, where tea party candidate Rand Paul is running hard in a GOP primary battle against Trey Grayson, the handpicked candidate of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Some tea party activists suggested they may seek to oust Utah's other senator, Orrin G. Hatch (R), whose term expires in 2012.


    Until this year, Bennett faced few challenges in this reliably Republican state. In 2004, no one opposed him for the Republican nomination, and his general election victory was so assured that he didn't spend a penny on television ads. In 2006, he earned a 93 percent approval rating among Republican primary voters.

    But Bennett came under fire from conservative activists for voting for then-President George W. Bush's bank bailout measure in 2008 and, more recently, for working with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) on a health-care overhaul bill. Bennett has also taken heat for reneging on his campaign promise in 1992 to serve just two terms. He is also a close adviser to McConnell, and he sits on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, which opened him to blame for ballooning government spending.

    And it was not just the tea party that criticized him; the Washington-based Club for Growth, a long-standing advocate for fiscal conservatism, began running television ads against Bennett in March -- and set up a booth, alongside FreedomWorks, at the convention on Saturday.

    "The political atmosphere, obviously, has been toxic, and it's very clear some of the votes that I have cast have added to the toxic environment," Bennett told reporters after the defeat. Choking up, he added, "Looking back on them, with one or two very minor exceptions, I wouldn't have cast them any differently even if I'd known at the time it would cost me my career."

    Indeed, Bennett's critics have been harsh and unequivocal. One of them posted this comment on Twitter during the convention: "Bob Bennett fails to even mention the Constitution once during his speech before the delegates." Others chanted "TARP! TARP! TARP!" as he spoke, a reference to his vote for the bank bailout, the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

    Bennett lost in the second of three ballots under Utah's complicated nominating system. He did so despite an introduction from former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, who is enormously popular in Utah. Attendees applauded more vigorously for a video of Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), supporting one of Bennett's rivals, than they did for Romney, who won 89 percent of the vote in Utah's 2008 presidential primary.

    "You're seeing the rise of a new group of conservative leaders," said Rob Jordan, vice president of state and federal campaigns for FreedomWorks. "Maybe guys like Romney are fading a bit, even in Utah. We're going to build on the momentum from this race."

    The two remaining candidates -- lawyer Mike Lee and businessman Tim Bridgewater, both of whom courted tea party voters -- faced off in a third ballot. Because neither won 60 percent of the vote, they will compete again in a June 22 primary election. Either way , Utah is all but sure to elect a candidate in the fall with significant tea party support.

    In some states, however, the tea party's influence could produce Republican candidates who are so conservative they face difficulty against Democrats in the fall elections. In New York last year, a tea party candidate forced a more moderate Republican to withdraw from a congressional race, and then lost to Democrat Bill Owens.

    The Democratic Party is hoping for something similar in Kentucky, a conservative state where Democrats are regularly elected to statewide office. One view holds that the Democratic nominee -- to be chosen May 18, just like the Republican nominee -- would have a better shot at taking the Senate seat in a matchup with Paul precisely because of his tea party credentials.

    [rabble, rabble, far-left smears]

  • #2
    In light of this damning evidence, assuming it's correct, I will retract my "they don't do jack ****" condemnation of the TP. I'll continuing hating them for being stupid, undignified and arrogant, however.
    1011 1100
    Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

    Comment


    • #3
      Um. You just labeled an entire movement as stupid, undignified and arrogant. Do you grasp that?

      Also it's from the Washington Post. I think assuming the Washington Post got it right is generally a safe bet.
      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
      ){ :|:& };:

      Comment


      • #4
        But they are. Shockingly I actually agree with Elok...
        Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
          Um. You just labeled an entire movement as stupid, undignified and arrogant.
          PLease explain why they aren't that and why it's wrong to describe them in such way.
          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

          Steven Weinberg

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
            PLease explain why they aren't that and why it's wrong to describe them in such way.
            Is there anything inherently arrogant about wanting to keep what you earn?

            vs.

            Is there anything inherently arrogant about wanting other people to pay for your lifestyle?

            ...or stupid for that matter.
            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
            ){ :|:& };:

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
              Is there anything inherently arrogant about wanting to keep what you earn?

              vs.

              Is there anything inherently arrogant about wanting other people to pay for your lifestyle?

              ...or stupid for that matter.

              Depends on if you want a society or anarchy - you seem to be a supporter of the latter.
              With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

              Steven Weinberg

              Comment


              • #8


                Ok, that's right folks, disagreeing with the welfare state = anarchist. Now I've heard everything.
                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                ){ :|:& };:

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                  Depends on if you want a society or anarchy - you seem to be a supporter of the latter.
                  How are they mutually exclusive? Anarchy is just 1) the extreme decentralization of power, or 2) the absence of authority. It has nothing to do with society.

                  And you think the Tea Party is an anarchist movement? What the hell are you smoking?
                  "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frédéric Bastiat
                  (+7.00, -6.97)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's good to see that the Tea Party is shaking up the Conservative movement.
                    Please put Asher on your ignore list.
                    Please do not quote Asher.
                    He will go away if we ignore him.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Congrats TPers. You just got rid of one of the staunchist, most solidly conservative members of the Senate. Kudos, morans.
                      "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                      "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I didn't see anything about a topless incumbent at a tea party.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It is good that Hauldren Collider is here to restore some sense of intelligence to this forum.

                          You dp****s demonsize the Tea Party as teabaggers and antichrists because you never left the first grade, and find it easy to villify hundreds of thousands of people using sexual slang and accusations of racism rather than actually recognize that they might be smarter than you.

                          In light of this damning evidence, assuming it's correct, I will retract my "they don't do jack ****" condemnation of the TP. I'll continuing hating them for being stupid, undignified and arrogant, however.
                          You flip pizzas for a living, majored in English, and tried to pay a scam self-publishing Web site to read your atrocious poetry. And you think you're qualified to call a group of other people who want responsible government and conservative spending stupid.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                            Congrats TPers. You just got rid of one of the staunchist, most solidly conservative members of the Senate. Kudos, morans.
                            Given that his rivals will be voting with conservatives most of the time, how is that an arguement in favor of keeping Bennett?
                            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                              Um. You just labeled an entire movement as stupid, undignified and arrogant. Do you grasp that?
                              Leaving aside whether that label applies to the TPs, suppose I'd called the entire Intelligent Design movement "fanatical, dishonest and overbearing." Would you agree with that, even though it's applying terms in equally broad strokes to an entire movement?

                              Also it's from the Washington Post. I think assuming the Washington Post got it right is generally a safe bet.
                              I was referring to HL, not his source.
                              1011 1100
                              Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X