No, it doesn't. Just because 95% of the population might think it's a good idea to wreck the economy, devalue the property of the other 5%, and just in general set economic policy back 6000 years doesn't mean that the rest of us should let them.
But that was also an extreme example. Your defense of it is just an example of your extremism. A better example is something like universal health care - just because a faint majority wants "something for nothing", as it were, doesn't mean they should get it.
But that was also an extreme example. Your defense of it is just an example of your extremism. A better example is something like universal health care - just because a faint majority wants "something for nothing", as it were, doesn't mean they should get it.
Comment