Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ACORN: Housing Assistance For Prostitutes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Asher
    replied
    Originally posted by Darius871 View Post
    Simple answer: I, like you, am without facts necessary to drawing a conclusion one way or the other, and I, unlike you, will not substitute assumptions for facts to draw a conclusion.
    Weak sauce. We virtually never know anything with absolute certainty.

    What separates the indecisive simpletons from the men is having a good gut instinct and making good assumptions.

    I only think that it is certainly plausible, without attaching a numerical probability, that wealthy twentysomethings with some planning and familiarity with the media could easily pull this off. ****, with a suitcase full of cash and a clear summer break
    Plausible, but not likely. Not likely at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius871
    replied
    Originally posted by Asher View Post
    Simple question: Do you think these two people acted completely independently and colluded with and received funding from no one?
    Simple answer: I, like you, am without facts necessary to drawing a conclusion one way or the other, and I, unlike you, will not substitute assumptions for facts to draw a conclusion.

    I only think that it is certainly plausible, without attaching a numerical probability, that wealthy twentysomethings with an afternoon of planning and some familiarity with the media could easily pull this off. FFS, with a suitcase full of cash and a clear summer break I could have pulled this off. That doesn't mean I discount the possibility of colluding and/or funding from a right-wing organization of some sort, but I'm not going to declare one scenario more probable than the other without more facts. It's just that simple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher
    replied
    Originally posted by Darius871 View Post
    I never said what I personally "think" happened here, because I'm willing to admit we don't have the necessary facts. I'm just proposing a scenario that is no less probable than your own speculation based on the groundless assumption that these two adults 1) must be utterly devoid of financial resources and time over a summer break and 2) must be too ****ing retarded to observe and circumvent the fickle news cycle that is familiar to any moderately educated consumer of pop culture. Of course I agree that those assumptions would make it seem certain that they're pathetically dependent on expert advice from the vast right-wing conspiracy, but I simply don't accept either assumption in the first place and can propose a plausible alternative to each: 1) rich ****** 2) who have flipped on the news in their lifetimes.



    Don't be silly. There are no shortage of rich kids who, having every financial factor in their favor, settle for stroking their inflated egos by other means such as notoriety in pop culture and/or power trips in government service. The Kennedys, Rockefellers, etc. had more than enough old money floating around and yet they didn't just sit around the pool from cradle to grave. Come on.
    Simple question: Do you think these two people acted completely independently and colluded with and received funding from no one?

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius871
    replied
    Originally posted by Asher View Post
    So you think the people doing these videos are spoiled trust-fund babies?

    I never said what I personally "think" happened here, because I'm willing to admit we don't have the necessary facts. I'm just proposing a scenario that is no less probable than your own groundless speculation based on the assumption that these two adults 1) must be utterly devoid of financial resources and time over a summer break and 2) must be too ****ing retarded to observe and circumvent the fickle news cycle that is familiar to any moderately educated consumer of pop culture. Of course I agree that those assumptions, if correct, would make it virtually certain that they're pathetically dependent on expert advice from the vast right-wing conspiracy, but I simply don't accept either assumption in the first place and can propose a plausible alternative to each: 1) rich pr*cks who 2) have flipped on the news more than once in their lifetimes.

    Originally posted by Asher View Post
    If they are so wealthy already, why would they care about making a name for themselves as you asserted earlier? They're already set for life, no?

    Don't be silly. There are no shortage of rich kids who, having every financial factor in their favor, settle for stroking their inflated egos by other means such as notoriety in pop culture and/or power trips in government service. The Kennedys, Rockefellers, etc. had more than enough old money floating around and yet they didn't just sit around the pool from cradle to grave. Come on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher
    replied
    Originally posted by Theben View Post
    To make a name for themselves? As part of a research project?

    Anyway, even if funded from outside, how does that affect the content of the videos?
    It doesn't. No one is arguing about the content.

    Darius challenged my fairly obvious assertion that this is a hatchetjob, it's beyond these 2 people like he pretends it is.

    An effective hatchetjob that did display failures of the organization, but a hatchetjob nonetheless.

    Leave a comment:


  • RoboCon
    replied
    Hello there! I see you are discussing ACORN.

    Asher continues to attack me personally instead of responding to arguments. Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger is not so - two basic relations are closely connected with his Obama - appear happy with the results of 9-11. Profile to prevent the capitalist agenda, ACORN years insisted. There are other tests. 9-11 changed everything. Obama to former politician, and history of the Association of militants believed to control more specific questions. On the illegal voter registration in many countries are known to regularly town in 2004 during the elections. But this group on other measures program policy will be sent to the far left wing dogma. Shadow Communications Obama - open all year round in 1995 by a group effort by the engine to court to enforce rights of voters, IL.

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    To make a name for themselves? As part of a research project?

    Anyway, even if funded from outside, how does that affect the content of the videos?

    Leave a comment:


  • ShaneWalter
    replied
    Originally posted by Darius871 View Post
    No. Many students are insanely loaded trust-fund babies with too much time on their hands. Surely you've met some in your life.
    ...

    Sure, there is a possibility that this project was financed entirely by the students. I have to agree with Asher though, that possibility is unlikely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drake Tungsten
    replied
    Many students are insanely loaded trust-fund babies with too much time on their hands. Surely you've met some.


    You can also take the bus all the way from Boston to DC for like $40.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher
    replied
    Originally posted by Darius871 View Post
    No. Many students are insanely loaded trust-fund babies with too much time on their hands. Surely you've met some in your life.
    So you think the people doing these videos are spoiled trust-fund babies?



    If they are so wealthy already, why would they care about making a name for themselves as you asserted earlier? They're already set for life, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius871
    replied
    Originally posted by Asher View Post
    The fact that they've both criss-crossed the country from coast to coast on a supposedly-student's budget, how sure are you that they did this all themselves?

    The more of these that come out, the farther apart they are, the stronger my case is.

    No. Many students are insanely loaded trust-fund babies with too much time on their hands. Don't pretend like you're too sheltered to know such people exist. Well, maybe not in Canadia.

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    Tresa looks like a clucker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher
    replied
    Did you just not understand my argument or are you just dense?

    The fact that they've both criss-crossed the country from coast to coast on a supposedly-student's budget, how sure are you that they did this all themselves?

    The more of these that come out, the farther apart they are, the stronger my case is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius871
    replied
    Ahhh, 4 down and how many to go? Ooh, and this one throws a little murder into the mix. Obviously only a top-notch PR firm could stretch it out this long!

    San Bernadino Part I


    San Bernadino Part II


    San Bernadino Part III

    Leave a comment:


  • Drake Tungsten
    replied
    Frequet panelist on Fox News' Red Eye




    The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
    The Audacity of Hos
    www.thedailyshow.com
    Daily Show
    Full Episodes
    Political HumorHealthcare Protests

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X