Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How the Soviets Really Won WWII :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oh, and no, the germans can't just send land based aircrafts as they wan't. They still need to break Malta, and then Egypt, and then they have to move to the Gibraltar Strait. It will take several months where the brits can start moving support up from the south.


    Support from where in the south? Colonial ****ing subsaharan Africa? What ****ing video game do you think you're playing?
    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
    Stadtluft Macht Frei
    Killing it is the new killing it
    Ultima Ratio Regum

    Comment


    • Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
      Ehrm, what the hell are you talking about ? The units around britain will probably go to iceland/canada, but the southern units will stay put.


      And be supplied from where, you crazy person? By whom?
      SA You know those that was allied with the brits ? They could even get some stuff from other aliiies such as Canada and US. Those that send lots of ships to england could probably also send one or two to gibraltar. Guess that they probably would be eager to support the last allied site in europe from where it would be possible to make a supported counterattack
      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

      Steven Weinberg

      Comment


      • Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
        Oh, and no, the germans can't just send land based aircrafts as they wan't. They still need to break Malta, and then Egypt, and then they have to move to the Gibraltar Strait. It will take several months where the brits can start moving support up from the south.


        Support from where in the south? Colonial ****ing subsaharan Africa? What ****ing video game do you think you're playing?
        And what idiotic video game are you watching ? or rather, what idiotic view of the world are you fantasising about ? SA living in mud huts ?
        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

        Steven Weinberg

        Comment


        • Are we assuming that the British would make a truce with Germany or surrender and collaborate? I think a truce is actually realistic, since it was strongly considered after Dunkirk. Hitler was ideologically positive towards Anglo-Saxons, and he would have been happy with a cease-fire if it would free his hand against the Soviets. Collaboration isn't really realistic.
          John Brown did nothing wrong.

          Comment


          • Well, it's a bit blurred, but I assume that the germans has invaded but the british has set up gov at a new place.

            A truce will actually make a serious mess - not exactly a situation where the germans wuold be willing to send the reserves to the east.
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • SA You know those that was allied with the brits ? They could even get some stuff from other aliiies such as Canada and US. Those that send lots of ships to england could probably also send one or two to gibraltar. Guess that they probably would be eager to support the last allied site in europe from where it would be possible to make a supported counterattack


              Are you smoking crack or something?

              a) The US was NOT formally allied with the British at this point. In fact, the British were still paying IN GOLD for any supplies they received until the middle of 1941, well after the battle of Britain ended. I have no idea what makes you think that the US would suddenly have decided to throw supplies at the British in North Africa for free

              b) SA and Canada keeping the British supplied and fighting in North Africa?

              Seriously, you should probably give up at this point.
              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                And what idiotic video game are you watching ? or rather, what idiotic view of the world are you fantasising about ? SA living in mud huts ?
                Seriously, you need to give up the crack, you buffoon. The population of SA in WW2 was perhaps 10 million, with probably 2 million whites, a few hundred thousand (a million?) Indians and the rest black. The British population was 40 million or so. I think it's pretty safe to say that the GDP of SA was PERHAPS 10% of Britain's in 1939, and its industrial production was certainly even a lower than that.

                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                Killing it is the new killing it
                Ultima Ratio Regum

                Comment


                • Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                  SA You know those that was allied with the brits ? They could even get some stuff from other aliiies such as Canada and US. Those that send lots of ships to england could probably also send one or two to gibraltar. Guess that they probably would be eager to support the last allied site in europe from where it would be possible to make a supported counterattack


                  Are you smoking crack or something?

                  a) The US was NOT formally allied with the British at this point. In fact, the British were still paying IN GOLD for any supplies they received until the middle of 1941, well after the battle of Britain ended. I have no idea what makes you think that the US would suddenly have decided to throw supplies at the British in North Africa for free

                  b) SA and Canada keeping the British supplied and fighting in North Africa?

                  Seriously, you should probably give up at this point.
                  Nah, no reason to do such. Oh, and why do you belive that US should do anything for free - they probably expect the brits to pay later as ususal. The british empire had after all some credit worthiness even if the british isles was lost.
                  With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                  Steven Weinberg

                  Comment


                  • The Commonwealth country in WW2 which came closest to matching Britain for industrial capacity was Canada, and even Canada's was only a small fraction of Britain's.

                    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                    Stadtluft Macht Frei
                    Killing it is the new killing it
                    Ultima Ratio Regum

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                      Nah, no reason to do such. Oh, and why do you belive that US should do anything for free - they probably expect the brits to pay later as ususal. The british empire had after all some credit worthiness even if the british isles was lost.
                      Holy ****, you idiot. I just got through telling you that the US was still supplying under CASH AND CARRY during the battle of Britain, and for a good 6 months after it ended.
                      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                      Stadtluft Macht Frei
                      Killing it is the new killing it
                      Ultima Ratio Regum

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                        Seriously, you need to give up the crack, you buffoon. The population of SA in WW2 was perhaps 10 million, with probably 2 million whites, a few hundred thousand (a million?) Indians and the rest black. The British population was 40 million or so. I think it's pretty safe to say that the GDP of SA was PERHAPS 10% of Britain's in 1939, and its industrial production was certainly even a lower than that.

                        Yeah, and so what? They shouldn't support GB, but only Gibraltar - guess that it would be possible.

                        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                        Steven Weinberg

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                          Holy ****, you idiot. I just got through telling you that the US was still supplying under CASH AND CARRY during the battle of Britain, and for a good 6 months after it ended.

                          And ?
                          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                          Steven Weinberg

                          Comment


                          • If Britain fell I expect the US would shelter the RN.

                            Comment




                            • The Germans will have taken over all of North Africa and the ME, the mediterannean, the British isles etc. and yet somehow the British are going to keep running supplies into a tiny strip of land thousands of miles from the nearest base of support?



                              The RN would start to FALL APART the day that Britain gets knocked out. SA and Canada couldn't keep it running. The Americans weren't in the war yet, and in fact weren't even yet willing to lend the British money to keep them supplied.

                              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                              Stadtluft Macht Frei
                              Killing it is the new killing it
                              Ultima Ratio Regum

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post
                                If Britain fell I expect the US would shelter the RN.
                                What do you mean by this? Allow them to dock at Newport news, fill up with supplies and go back to fight?
                                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                                Killing it is the new killing it
                                Ultima Ratio Regum

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X