Irish child abuse

[Ben Kenobi]

I'm calling them as I see them, Ben.

I've seen your picture. It screams kiddyfiddler. Some people, you just know.

There's a reason you've never had a real girlfriend, and I think we all know it. Your best vector is to get into the priesthood, Ben. Lots of opportunities there for you.

Other options: Camp counselor, boy scout leader.

JM, does this not constitute a personal attack?

[Asher]

JM, does this not constitute a personal attack?

I'm just trying to assist you.

I guess it hit a little too close to home.

[Ben Kenobi]

You went over the top and called me a closeted pedophile. I was like WTF, what set you off?

It's Miller Time for you Asher.

[Asher]

You went over the top and called me a closeted pedophile. I was like WTF, what set you off?

It's Miller Time for you Asher.

Ming did it and didn't even get a warning. Precedent has been set.

The fact that it's likely true, that just makes it even better.

No wonder you're so upset by this.

[KrazyHorse]

Found it.

If you have -1 as hetero, 0 as asexual and +1 as homosexual, you won't get a gaussian distribution. Gaussian distributions have means either very close to 0, or 0.

AGKLAJDFFAFSDF MY EYES

Secondly, as Kuci already said, they have to be linearly dependent on each other. Going from 100 percent heterosexual to 100 percent gay is a linearly dependent spectrum. Hetero-asexual-homosexual is in no way linearly dependent upon each other.

OK, now I'm just quoting this to cause KH pain too.

Thundertard. Two ***** enter...

[Drake Tungsten]

Wow, that is retarded.

BTW, do ***** really think that using big words (ie. "Gaussian" instead of "normal") will cover up their underlying ignorance?

[Japher]

Dude, saying "retarded" hurts the mongoloids feelings. Use "gay" instead.

[Drake Tungsten]

For instance, were you aware that deliciousness of pizza is distributed as a Gaussian? The mean is fairly tasty and the standard deviation is pepperoni

I'm sad that I missed this thread the first time through.

[KrazyHorse]

Hey, Hera: have you figured out the difference between the distribution of means of samples of independent identically distributed random variables and the underlying distribution yet?

Also, do you understand what "infinite support" means, and why any random variable which only takes values in some finite range can never be a gaussian r.v.?

[KrazyHorse]

Wow, that is retarded.

BTW, do ***** really think that using big words (ie. "Gaussian" instead of "normal") will cover up their underlying ignorance?

Can you tell which of those quotes is Ben and which is Hera without peeking?

If not, who should be more embarrassed?

[Drake Tungsten]

Even after we get through your problem of not having a ****ing metric, we have no guarantee that the distribution is Gaussian

It's extremely unlikely that it would be, in fact.

[Drake Tungsten]

Can you tell which of those quotes is Ben and which is Hera without peeking?

Oh, it's both of them? I thought it was just Hera. He should be immensely embarrassed by that...

Ben should be slightly less embarassed. Still a ****, but he doesn't claim to be a scientist in training.

[Kuciwalker]

Both of those are Ben, unfortunately, if he's talking about my post.

[KrazyHorse]

Ah, crap. I thought the first one was Hera.

[Drake Tungsten]

Don't worry. Hera said some equally dumb crap...

Take n individuals and at first you'll get random distribution but the more people you include into the study the closer the histogram will match a gaussian.

-1 Preference for opposite sex
0 No preference for either sex
+1 Preference for the same sex


I think the mean is probably around -0.4