Originally posted by KrazyHorse
I did read what you wrote.
This still makes no sense.
The government can increase volatility by introducing new risk factors into the marketplace (the chance that you won't get bailout money) but the increased volatility from this in itself CANNOT directly reduce average stock prices below that in the counterfactual world of no bailouts at all.
I did read what you wrote.
The re-evaluation had to happen. The willy nilly save one entity, bail out another, let some fail... all without prior notice (or in direct contradiction with prior notice) and off public balance sheet crap can only increase fear (volatility) and cause the re-evaluation to overshoot.
This still makes no sense.
The government can increase volatility by introducing new risk factors into the marketplace (the chance that you won't get bailout money) but the increased volatility from this in itself CANNOT directly reduce average stock prices below that in the counterfactual world of no bailouts at all.
Comment