Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is this man saying?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is this man saying?

    I'm reading Fareed Zakaria's The Post American World. Zakaria opines the Third World is rapidly becoming more modern but not more Western. He distinguishes these two terms with the explanation:

    Becoming a modern society is about industialization, urbanization, and rising levels of literacy, education and wealth. The qualities that make a society Western, in contrast, are special: the classical legacy, Christianity, the separation of church and state, the rule of law, civil society.
    I cannot figure out what he means, in the context, by the phrase "civil society." Can someone help me out?

    Why, for example, is Beijing lacking in a civil society?

  • #2
    Maybe because they are cheating in the Olympics?
    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
    Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      1. He is saying nothing at all. Trust me.

      2. Presumably by 'civil society' he refers to a Lockian idea of civil society? In other words, 'belonging' to a civil society, as the primary element of belonging (over family or caste or tribe); that is a western concept, which is not necessarily the case elsewhere (ie, believing you are an American, first, rather than an Aryan or a Frank or a Slav or whatever your ethnic/tribal descent is).
      http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_ml...628_index.html for example as it refers to China specifically.
      <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
      I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe because they are cheating in the Olympics?
        And in the little-girl-signing part as well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Shamelessly stolen from Wiki (OMG), a modern def from the London School of Economics:

          Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power. Civil societies are often populated by organizations such as registered charities, development non-governmental organizations, community groups, women's organizations, faith-based organizations, professional associations, trade unions, self-help groups, social movements, business associations, coalitions and advocacy groups.
          Plus some more stuff from them: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS...il_society.htm
          Blah

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by snoopy369
            1. He is saying nothing at all. Trust me.

            2. Presumably by 'civil society' he refers to a Lockian idea of civil society? ...
            You mention of Locke rang a bell. So I wandered over to Wikipedia and found this:

            Civil society is composed of the totality of voluntary civic and social organizations and institutions that form the basis of a functioning society as opposed to the force-backed structures of a state (regardless of that state's political system) and commercial institutions.
            This sounds like the old "Social Contract" theory, which I never bought into. I.e. We entered into a society with a government when we entered into a contract, and the government has only the power over us which we granted it.

            Edit: Where it would have an application though is the West's belief in limited government. China and other nations in the developing world don't embrace this concept. Oh, and this would also give rise to "civil rights," something the Chinese definitely don't have!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Zkribbler
              Edit: Where it would have an application though is the West's belief in limited government. China and other nations in the developing world don't embrace this concept. Oh, and this would also give rise to "civil rights," something the Chinese definitely don't have!
              IIRC it is indeed often used to indicate that a society allows more input from citizens or non-state orgs as opposed to a state where the gov decides everything "from above".
              Blah

              Comment


              • #8
                2. Presumably by 'civil society' he refers to a Lockian idea of civil society
                Given that it's Zakharia, I'd look more to Voltaire and Rousseau. Essentially he's saying that they are modern, but 'unEnlightened' for lack of a better term.
                Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Christianity, the separation of church and state
                  Anyone else find this funny?
                  Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
                  Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


                    Given that it's Zakharia, I'd look more to Voltaire and Rousseau. Essentially he's saying that they are modern, but 'unEnlightened' for lack of a better term.
                    How are they different from Americans then?
                    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                    "Capitalism ho!"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DaShi


                      How are they different from Americans then?
                      Someone hand me my fish.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                        "Capitalism ho!"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You might want to look into Burke and his "little platoons."

                          Basically, the presence of civil society means that there are various NGOs which are active and independent. (Essentially people with a like interest have some organizations that can stand up for their interests so that the government, big corportations, revolutionaries, etc. don't trample all over them.)
                          "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                          -Joan Robinson

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X