It's war. Part II

[Heraclitus]

Ok, tell us Serb how can anyone take your claims that Georgia is the agressor seriusly?


Dude Russia is a great power while Georgia is a weak eastern European country. Can you explain what in the world they would have been thinking when they decided "ah hell lets just start a war against a major nuclear power for a bit of fun!"

[Propaganda]

Originally posted by BeBro


German stupidity defies all laws of human development.

[Saras]

Originally posted by Serb

Why don't you just shut the **** up? I'm pretty tired of your lies. Georgia violated the cease-fire treaty, attacked and destroyed a city with heavy artillery, killed about 2000 civilians and Georgia is a victim in your universe?

You are really blind in your hatred towards Russia. Really blind.

The ceasefire treaty was violated by separatists - who were supposed to be silenced by YOUR peace keepers.

The 2000 killed is a figure pulled out of some Lubyanka disinfo deparment Lieutenants arse and not backed up by anything.

[BeBMan]

Originally posted by Propaganda

Racist!

[Heraclitus]

Population:

Georgia 4,630,84
Russia 142,008,838

GDP total:

Georgia $20.5 billion
Russia $1.290 trillion

Land Area:

Georgia 69,700 km²
Russia 17,075,400 km²


Its quite clear who is David and who is Goliath.

[Saras]

Originally posted by Heraclitus
Ok, tell us Serb how can anyone take your claims that Georgia is the agressor seriusly?


Dude Russia is a great power while Georgia is a weak eastern European country. Can you explain what in the world they would have been thinking when they decided "ah hell lets just start a war against a major nuclear power for a bit of fun!"

EEEVERYONE IS AGAINST SACRED MOTHER RUUUSSIAAA!!!

Just watch the video Serbs sig links to.

[FrostyBoy]

Originally posted by Propaganda



So much for me giving a hypothetical....

Let's put it this way..What if the workers could outline a general plan of production, i.e. an emphasis on certain kinds of consumer goods, with today's technology?

Would crash.

Level of understanding of nature required: 100
Current level: 20

Level of technology required: 100
Current level 10

Level of social understanding and acceptance required: 100
Current level: 1

Like I said, a long long way to go, we are babies with a crazy idea, that won't work for a long time to come, a lot like Democracy's history.

Perhaps 500 years, optimistically, 200 years. The world would have to be majorly unified, not just geographically, but culturally, intellectually and lots of other "lly's" as well.

[Saras]

Originally posted by FrostyBoy


Would crash.

Level of understanding of nature required: 100
Current level: 20

Level of technology required: 100
Current level 10

Level of social understanding and acceptance required: 100
Current level: 1

Like I said, a long long way to go, we are babies with a crazy idea, that won't work for a long time to come, a lot like Democracies history.

Perhaps 500 years, optimistically, 200 years. The world would have to be majorly unified, not just geographically, but culturally, intellectually and lots of other "lly's" as well.

So, never.

[MarkG]

we define who the aggressor is by size? i thought it was by actions....

[Serb]

Originally posted by Saras
Your country being aggressor is a valid opinion (fact to me, but I'm being generous) and not a troll. You have much to learn.

1) Then what is agressor in your dictionary?

2) Tell me, do you believe or not that Georgian army started the major offence and bombarded the South Osetian capital with heavy artillery and Grads, nearly a day before a first Russian tank entered the South Osetia?
3) Doesn't it make Georgia an agressor?
4) Do you realize that Russian forces are trying to repel invided Georgians from the South Osetia (the place where Georgian soldiers shouldn't be according to the cease-fire treaty Georgians signed in 1992), not to conquer Georgia?

[BeBMan]

I thought we just put them in threadi titles when we like it

[Heraclitus]

Originally posted by MarkG
we define who the aggressor is by size? i thought it was by actions....

Yes, but tell me how may times in history has the power that has been completley outmatched by a factor of a douzen to one been the agressor?


In any case its always best to side with the weaker side. I mean it saves you a lot of thinking. That's how I decided that I support Macedonians against teh Greek Agressors (tm).

[Propaganda]

Originally posted by FrostyBoy


Would crash.

Level of understanding of nature required: 100
Current level: 20

Level of technology required: 100
Current level 10

Level of social understanding and acceptance required: 100
Current level: 1

Like I said, a long long way to go, we are babies with a crazy idea, that won't work for a long time to come, a lot like Democracy's history.

Perhaps 500 years, optimistically, 200 years. The world would have to be majorly unified, not just geographically, but culturally, intellectually and lots of other "lly's" as well.

Unfortunately, the world will doubtfully reach those stages, even in your optimistic timeline, but there can be a unified economic system, like the Common Market, but much more sophisticated. Globalization is taking us there, as it is, but maybe it is possible to make it feasible, with a socialist mindset. The rest will come at a higher stage of development.

[Heraclitus]

Originally posted by BeBro
I thought we just put them in threadi titles when we like it

Yes its quite fun. We can start lots of threadi this way, when there are real wars.


I wonder what poly would have looked like during WW2, ahh the delicius and fun spam.

[Sandman]

What would the USSR have been like had there been glasnost, but no perestroika(juxtaposed to today's China) with today's computer and nanotechnology?

I reckon the Chinese are more secure in themselves than Russia, so they can aggressively import Western technology and ideas without feeling bad. For the Soviet Union to 'do a China' it would have to accept that it was behind the West technologically.