Meet Barack Hussein Mugabe

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Grandpa Troll


you right, because "consuming" equates to trucking goods and products and raw materials = higher building costs = less who can afford them homes oh and dont forget the people who deliver those goods get nipped as well, before they even get to transport any materials to the consumers so as they can...

Who told you this naive garbage?

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by DaShi
I just like to give idiots something to respond to.

I know a lot of judges who think they can spot an idiot, simply because they know how to turn their head when passing a mirror

[Winston]

Originally posted by Arrian
It's really a fairly nasty smear, considering what Mugabe's been up to.

Why does every criticism of Barack Obama have to be labeled a smear. It's almost like a reflex with some of you guys.

Take a look at the inflation rates of Zimbabwe, then think about how Barack Obama's propoposal is likely to affect prices, and it may dawn on you that the aim of the OP might have been to draw a somewhat satirical, exaggerated parallel between what is basically two variants of the same Socialist approach.

I'm guessing, but this explanation seems far more plausible to me than your fairly nasty smear..

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Grandpa Troll


I know a lot of judges who think they can spot an idiot, simply because they know how to turn their head when passing a mirror

I rest my case with your "witty" retort.

[DirtyMartini]

Originally posted by Winston


Why does every criticism of Barack Obama have to be labeled a smear. It's almost like a reflex with some of you guys.

Take a look at the inflation rates of Zimbabwe, then think about how Barack Obama's propoposal is likely to affect prices, and it may dawn on you that the aim of the OP might have been to draw a somewhat satirical, exaggerated parallel between what is basically two variants of the same Socialist approach.

I'm guessing, but this explanation seems far more plausible to me than your fairly nasty smear..

and they're both black...funny names too.

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Winston


Why does every criticism of Barack Obama have to be labeled a smear. It's almost like a reflex with some of you guys.

Take a look at the inflation rates of Zimbabwe and it may dawn on you that the aim of the OP might have been to draw a somewhat satirical, exaggerated parallel between what is basically two variants of the same Socialist approach.

I'm guessing, but this explanation seems far more plausible to me than your fairly nasty smear..

It's kind of hard not to take it as a smear. Do you think comparing Bush to the devil is only criticism?

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by DaShi


Who told you this naive garbage?

Well, this "garbage" as you put it, plays out in my professional as well as personal life.

I have 46 people who work for me, over 35 pieces of equipment "road ready" whic costs me substantially more to operate and shrinks an already narrow R.O.I.


We dont get more for our product, we do however pay more all around and that has to come from somewhere

Now, I have only been managing trucking for near 20 years, not sure where your "garbage" piles up from, but mine comes from everyday reality sir


Jusy sharing and no, not pulling this out of my arse or off the internet

Gramps

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Grandpa Troll


Well, this "garbage" as you put it, plays out in my professional as well as personal life.

I have 46 people who work for me, over 35 pieces of equipment "road ready" whic costs me substantially more to operate and shrinks an already narrow R.O.I.


We dont get more for our product, we do however pay more all around and that has to come from somewhere

Now, I have only been managing trucking for near 20 years, not sure where your "garbage" piles up from, but mine comes from everyday reality sir


Jusy sharing and no, not pulling this out of my arse or off the internet

Gramps

You forgot to post a stupid picture that shows that's your not being serious.

Sorry, Gramps. But I'm not going to give you any more respect than you've given me here. So suck it.

[Zkribbler]

Originally posted by Winston


Why does every criticism of Barack Obama have to be labeled a smear. It's almost like a reflex with some of you guys.

Take a look at the inflation rates of Zimbabwe, then think about how Barack Obama's propoposal is likely to affect prices, and it may dawn on you that the aim of the OP might have been to draw a somewhat satirical, exaggerated parallel between what is basically two variants of the same Socialist approach.

I'm guessing, but this explanation seems far more plausible to me than your fairly nasty smear..

Ahhhh...Socialim without government ownership of businesses. Verrrrrry clever.

[DaShi]

Socialism is teh evil!

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by DaShi


You forgot to post a stupid picture that shows that's your not being serious.

Sorry, Gramps. But I'm not going to give you any more respect than you've given me here. So suck it.

Im not being ugly, just responding to your post.

Since I am not going to take it any further, I am serious and no picture necessary

Please dont tell me to do something you in person are not man enough to pull off

It isnt nice

Gramps

[Winston]

Originally posted by Zkribbler
Ahhhh...Socialims without government ownership of businesses. Verrrrrry clever.

So Socialist policies are limited to government ownership now?

Epic fail there, Zkribbler. You tax companies and distribute the proceeds among voters (hey!) to regulate the market, that's a Socialist approach in my book.

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Grandpa Troll


Im not being ugly, just responding to your post.

Since I am not going to take it any further, I am serious and no picture necessary

Please dont tell me to do something you in person are not man enough to pull off

It isnt nice

Gramps

So you act like a jerk and then complain about me responding in kind.

Wow, very simple Gramps, surprised no one thunk up that tactic before you

Oh and I never found your picture funny, so

[Arrian]

Originally posted by Winston


Why does every criticism of Barack Obama have to be labeled a smear. It's almost like a reflex with some of you guys.

Take a look at the inflation rates of Zimbabwe, then think about how Barack Obama's propoposal is likely to affect prices, and it may dawn on you that the aim of the OP might have been to draw a somewhat satirical, exaggerated parallel between what is basically two variants of the same Socialist approach.

I'm guessing, but this explanation seems far more plausible to me than your fairly nasty smear..

Criticism is fine. I happen to agree in this instance: I don't like the policy proposal in question.

You're blind, however, if you can't see how "Barack Hussein Mugabe" is a smear.

-Arrian

[rmsharpe]

Originally posted by Blaupanzer
Not clear why this makes him like Mugabe.

It's a clearly Mugabeist policy; set up a successful industry as a villain, seize their assets (there is no such thing as a "windfall profit") and redistribute them.

It'll be bad for the economy and probably commodity prices to go up farther and faster, utterly destroying any chance of relief to the American consumer.

Yes, it's an exaggeration; I don't think anything Obama can do (at least Constitutionally) could be as damaging as Mugabe and ZANU. But it's frightening how close this gets to being something that would be proposed in some tin pot dictatorship.