Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I cross-edited you.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by DanS
      The stuff that Oerdin quotes shows that solar power is 1.76x the price of coal-generated power, not 5x as he claimed originally.

      The system that is described in this paper is more complicated than a normal solar system, however. Panels + inverter + electolyzer + fuel cell + storage volume for hydrogren. Seems more complicated than lead-acid batteries.
      IIRC, solar power cannot efficiently charge lead-acid batteries due to its low current (or something like that). The gain of efficiency from this process would presumably save on the costs here (who knows, though?).
      <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
      I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

      Comment


      • #18
        Yeh, there's that. On the other hand, even though fuel cells are pretty good nowadays, they do take specialized maintenance.
        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

        Comment


        • #19
          Nuclear is clearly the best solution on a cost per kilowatt-hour basis. Make lots of nuclear plants and then use them to produce all the hydrogen and electricity we need. Energy problems solved.
          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

          Comment


          • #20
            Sounds good...
            <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
            I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

            Comment


            • #21
              The sun ain't nuclear?!?!
              I'm consitently stupid- Japher
              I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

              Comment


              • #22
                Those capital costs for nuclear don't seem right. As I recall, they're more like 3 to 6 cents/kwh. Also, you will have to try to get them built -- not an easy proposition nowadays in many parts of the world.

                In any event, just look at the chart of these prices over time. The price for solar is dropping steadily. While we can't discount a hitch in the works, it seems likely that solar will be the cheapest source of energy in the medium term for many areas of the world.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #23
                  Actually, the really interesting possibility is solar-in-space... I wonder if you could use H/O fuel cells to toss solar energy down to earth from a hugely efficient solar satellite.

                  I of course have no idea if it's in any way possible in terms of the costs of space lifts (as you'd have to take the water up there, right, and that's sorta expensive), but at least once we get on the moon we'll have easily available solar energy
                  <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                  I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Oh yes, someone in the Spanish forums registered as 'Theban', so you guys will finally have to spell it right if I'm to know who you are talking to
                    Tehben?
                    Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                    "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                    2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      No, space solar power is ridiculously expensive for terrestrial uses. It might work for some specialized space uses, however.
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Che really has it with teh revolutions
                        Blah

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Looking at all this stuff, it looks like Wind is actually cheaper than solar. Also the breakthrough is in electricity storage, which I imagine is even more useful for wind power.

                          The sun ain't nuclear?!?!
                          Fusion.

                          Just play SimCity and you'll know.
                          I'm still waiting for microwave power
                          "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                          -Joan Robinson

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Hey, that breakthrough might be just what I need.
                            I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                            I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              By the way, here's a more reasonably-worded article...

                              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by DanS
                                No, space solar power is ridiculously expensive for terrestrial uses. It might work for some specialized space uses, however.
                                It will presumably work for any space power... there's no other logical way to get power in space. The fact that you can get 100% utility out of solar power, have much higher power outputs due to the whole no ozone layer/atmosphere thing, and not having to carry around fuel, will help quite a lot

                                If you mean the water->O,H fuel cells method specifically, then I'd think it would work for lunar power, and mars power, if we have any sort of base there (in a location that is not permanently sun-facing)...
                                <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                                I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X